> No reason to have one FD per process monitored. Just a single FD, to
> which you can write() a control string to to add or remove a process
> from the list, and for which read() yields a small data record
> describing the process event that just happened. It's a bit plan-9ish
> but there's nothing wrong with that...
Ah, okay. Interesting idea. It would get around the limitation of having to
use rt signals to get the queueing (though I'm not likely to hit that limit in
any case).
Have to think about that one...
Chris
-- Chris Friesen | MailStop: 043/33/F10 Nortel Networks | work: (613) 765-0557 3500 Carling Avenue | fax: (613) 765-2986 Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada | email: cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/