Re: MPPE in kernel?

[Frank Cusack]

On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 11:04:14AM -0400, [e-mail] wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2003 04:59:29 PDT, Frank Cusack <[e-mail]>  said:
> > I've written a public domain implementation, which I'd be willing to
> > relicense under GPL (although I don't see the point), but in any case
> 
> Well.. there's a very good reason to relicense under GPL, or BSD, or X11-style.
> 
> And that's to cover your ass from being sued.
> 
> If you release it as "public domain", you waive *all* rights to it, including:
> 
> 1) The right to prohibit or control what people do with it, including taking
> it private and closed and making lots of money off it and basically ripping
> you off.

The code is trivial (compared to the effort required to use it in any
larger application).  I understand the value of this for the general
case, though.

> 2) You can't attach a "hold harmless" clause to it.  So if you put it in
> the public domain, since you don't have copyright on it anymore, you can't
> say "as a condition of copying, you promise not to sue me if this software
> turns your hair green".

I thought public domain explicitly meant that you get what you pay for.
Kind of like good samaritan laws.  It'd be interesting to hear from any
lawyers, are any on lkml?

/fc