Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.5.69-mm4 undefined active_load_balance

William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com)
Tue, 13 May 2003 12:38:47 -0700


On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 06:27:11PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
> --- sched.h.orig 2003-05-13 15:45:17.000000000 +0200
> +++ sched.h 2003-05-13 18:07:01.000000000 +0200
> @@ -158,10 +158,8 @@
> # define CONFIG_NR_SIBLINGS 0
> #endif
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NR_SIBLINGS
> +#if CONFIG_NR_SIBLINGS
> # define CONFIG_SHARE_RUNQUEUE 1
> -#else
> -# define CONFIG_SHARE_RUNQUEUE 0
> #endif
> extern void sched_map_runqueue(int cpu1, int cpu2);

Linus just committed a patch to eliminate such offenders.

Do you mean #if CONFIG_NR_SIBLINGS != 0 or #ifdef CONFIG_NR_SIBLINGS?

-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/