Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional

Carl-Daniel Hailfinger (c-d.hailfinger.kernel.2003@gmx.net)
Thu, 15 May 2003 00:59:47 +0200


Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> hpa wrote:
>
>
>>How about creating a master option like we have for experimental?
>>Something like "Allow removal of essential components?" (CONFIG_EMBEDDED)
>
>
> ...and that just enables another option: "REALLY allow removal of
> essential components?" (CONFIG_REALLY_EMBEDDED)
>
> :)

Reminds me of CONFIG_MORON back in December 2000

-dep_mbool ' NTFS write support (DANGEROUS)' CONFIG_NTFS_RW
$CONFIG_NTFS_FS $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
+dep_mbool ' NTFS write support (DANGEROUS)' CONFIG_MORON
$CONFIG_NTFS_FS $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
+dep_bool ' Are you sure? I hope you dont care about your NTFS
filesystems' CONFIG_NTFS_RW $CONFIG_MORON

;)

Carl-Daniel

-- 
And the mailer looked at the patch and, behold, it was good. And the
mailer decided to wrap the patch.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/