Re: [BENCHMARK AIM9] Regressions in 2.5.69

[Paolo Ciarrocchi]

From: Andrew Morton <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 00:47:07 -0700
To: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK AIM9] Regressions in 2.5.69

> "Paolo Ciarrocchi" <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all/Andrew/Martin,
> >  I noticed regression in a few tests,
> >  I deleted the results of tests that don't show differences between the two kernel version.
> > 
> >  Hope it helps.
> > 
> >  Ciao,
> >  		Paolo
> >  		
> >  2.5.67
> >  2.5.69
> > 
> >  creat-clo 10010 86.8132        86813.19 File Creations and Closes/second
> >  creat-clo 10030 22.0339        22033.90 File Creations and Closes/second
> >  ^^^^BIG REGRESSION
> 
> I cannot repeat any of this.  In fact 2.5.69-mm is a bit faster than
> 2.5.67.
> 
> I tested ext2 mainly.  But a spot-check of creat-clo on reiserfs showed
> no regression either.

Ok, thanks Andrew.
I dunno what happened during the test.
I'll try again to run the test with both the kernel.
I'll back to you if I'm able to reproduce those numbers.

Ciao,
          Paolo
 

-- 
______________________________________________
http://www.linuxmail.org/
Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr

Powered by Outblaze