Re: Question about style when converting from K&R to ANSI C.

[Steven Cole]

On Sun, 2003-06-01 at 10:11, Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 09:04:22AM -0700, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> > The reason I've liked this format is that it gives me a quick and 
> > universal way to find *specific* functions with vi or grep, by 
> > searching for "^function_name(".
> 
> Exactly.  I thought of making that point in my original posting and 
> figured everyone would tell me to use tags and I didn't want to have
> to remember all the other reasons I wanted this.
> 
> It really is nice knowing that "^function_name(" is the definition.

Thanks for the input.  You've convinced me.  When going through
arch/ppc/xmon/xmon.c, I will leave things like the following unchanged:

/* Command interpreting routine */
static int
cmds(struct pt_regs *excp)
{

My changes will be similar to the following:

@@ -1837,9 +1818,7 @@
        return *lineptr++;
 }

-void
-take_input(str)
-char *str;
+void take_input(char *str)
 {
        lineptr = str;
 }

I'll be changing the return type/function name line orientation only
when making other changes. And these will still go through the
applicable maintainers.

Steven