Re: [PATCH][ATM] assorted he driver cleanup

chas williams (chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil)
Sun, 01 Jun 2003 14:57:02 -0400


In message <20030529173637.GZ24054@conectiva.com.br>,Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo writes:
>Sure thing, but hey, spin_lock_irqsave and friends take care of how to behave
>when in up or smp, i.e. its how all the other drivers use spinlocks 8)

but on a single processor machine (i.e. #undef CONFIG_SMP) there is no
chance that there will be reads/writes from other processors so i dont
need any locking OR protection from interrupts. so the degenerate case
of spin_lock_irqsave() isnt quite as dengerate as i would like for this
particular spin lock.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/