Re: 2.4 v. 2.5 nfs_dentry_iput()

Trond Myklebust (trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no)
02 Jun 2003 21:52:05 +0200


>>>>> " " == Frank Cusack <fcusack@fcusack.com> writes:

> Hi, Could someone quickly explain the difference between the
> 2.4.20 and 2.5.69 nfs_dentry_iput()?

> static void nfs_dentry_iput(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode
> *inode) {
> if (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_NFSFS_RENAMED) {
> lock_kernel();
> inode-> i_nlink--; /* only in 2.5 */

Should eventually go into 2.4.x. Not critical...

> nfs_complete_unlink(dentry); unlock_kernel();
> } if (is_bad_inode(inode)) /* not in 2.5 */
> force_delete(inode); /* not in 2.5 */

Done in the VFS in 2.5

> /* When creating a negative dentry, we want to renew
> d_time */ nfs_renew_times(dentry); /* only in 2.5 */

Only needed for the new CTO code in 2.5.

> iput(inode);
> }

Cheers,
Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/