Re: [PATCH] IDE Power Management, try 2

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

> > I had to add yet another rq->flags bit for that, and I think that sucks
> 
> You don't have if you use additional, default pm_state (on == 0).
> This sucks too, but a bit less.

Can you elaborate ? I'm not sure I understand what you meant

> I think extending struct request is the way to go,
> pm_step & pm_state or even pointer to rq_pm_struct.

Ok. I'll wait for Jens ack and go that way if he agrees.

Ben.