Re: [PATCH][ATM] use rtnl_{lock,unlock} during device operations

Mr. James W. Laferriere (babydr@baby-dragons.com)
Sat, 7 Jun 2003 12:03:31 -0400 (EDT)


Hello James ,

On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, James Stevenson wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, chas williams wrote:
> > In message <20030606210620.G3232@almesberger.net>,Werner Almesberger writes:
> > >TCP connections will survive route changes, interface
> > >removals, etc.
> > really? if i remove my ethernet interface i expect all the
> > connections to die.

> Think of a latop with a normall ethernet card in it.
> When you unplug the cable it wont disconnect all the tcp
> connection on the interface so that you could re route everything though
> a wireless card.
This anology is incorrect or at least can be circumvented .
Ie: All physical interfaces could be unnumbered & th eloopback be
the only interface with THE ip . Then all routes lead to Rome as
it were .
Btw , This can & does work . Hth , JimL

-- 
       +------------------------------------------------------------------+
       | James   W.   Laferriere | System    Techniques | Give me VMS     |
       | Network        Engineer |     P.O. Box 854     |  Give me Linux  |
       | babydr@baby-dragons.com | Coudersport PA 16915 |   only  on  AXP |
       +------------------------------------------------------------------+
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/