Re: [PATCH] IDE Power Management, try 2
Jens Axboe (email@example.com)
Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:28:11 +0200
On Tue, Jun 10 2003, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On 10 Jun 2003, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 18:15, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 05 2003, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > > Jens, I think generic version of ide_do_drive_cmd() would be useful for
> > > > other block devices, what do you think?
> > >
> > > Something ala this? Completely untested, and I only did scsi_ioctl.c and
> > > ide-io.c. iirc, scsi uses somthing similar that could be adapted too.
> > Hrm... you didn't keep some functionalities I added with the PM
> > patch here... like marking of preempt requests so I can fetch them
> > even when drive is blocked, and ide_head_wait...
> > Ben
> I've looked for users of ide_preempt in drivers/ide/ and I think
> that REQ_PREEMPT can later die if we fix drivers to correctly mark
> sense requests with REQ_SENSE...
Indeed, besides preempt is not really something you can do completely
in the block layer safely. So I'd rather kill that logic.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/