Re: IDE IRQ probe brokenness.

Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:37:50 +0100

On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 05:42:41PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Basically we need a "NOT_AN_IRQ" value defined either globally or per
> port

All it needs is for someone to add the definition for NO_IRQ to all
architecture header files. ARM has an established use of NO_IRQ
already with currently 34 uses:

/*
* Use this value to indicate lack of interrupt
* capability
*/
#ifndef NO_IRQ
#define NO_IRQ ((unsigned int)(-1))
#endif

I'd prefer not to do another mindless time wasteful change just because
someone decides to use a different name.

-- 
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/