> Nightly Regression Summary
> for
> 2.5.72 vs 2.5.73
>
>
> Benchmark Pass/Fail Improvements Regressions
> Results Results Summary
> --------------- --------- ------------ -----------
> ----------- ----------- -------
>
> dbench.ext2 P N N
> 2.5.72 2.5.73 report
> dbench.ext3 P Y N
> 2.5.72 2.5.73 report
> dbench.jfs P N N
> 2.5.72 2.5.73 report
> dbench.reiser P N N
> 2.5.72 2.5.73 report
> dbench.xfs P N N
> 2.5.72 2.5.73 report
> kernbench P N N
> 2.5.72 2.5.73 report
> lmbench P Y Y
> 2.5.72 2.5.73 report
> rawiobench P N Y
> 2.5.72 2.5.73 report
> specjbb P Y Y
> 2.5.72 2.5.73 report
> specsdet P N Y
> 2.5.72 2.5.73 report
> tbench P Y N
> 2.5.72 2.5.73 report
> tiobench.ext2 P N N
> 2.5.72 2.5.73 report
> tiobench.ext3 P Y Y
> 2.5.72 2.5.73 report
> tiobench.jfs P N N
> 2.5.72 2.5.73 report
> tiobench.reiser P Y Y
> 2.5.72 2.5.73 report
> tiobench.xfs P N Y
> 2.5.72 2.5.73 report
> volanomark P N N
> 2.5.72 2.5.73 report
>
> http://ltcperf.ncsa.uiuc.edu/data/2.5.73/2.5.72-vs-2.5.73/
>
> Nightly Regression Summary
> for . . .
Wow! This is impressive. I'd love to see this include performance of
ext3 (or jfs) over NBD (network block device) too. Or at least
performance metrics like this for NBD some other way. I've done some
benchmarking myself for the work I've been doing on NBD but nothing near
this comprehensive. If someone had the spare time to do this though for
NBD, it'd help me enormously. Any interest??? :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/