Re: 2.5.74-mm1 fails to boot due to APIC trouble, 2.5.73mm3 works.

[William Lee Irwin III]

At some point in the past, zwane wrote:
>> The way i see it is that you can't use NR_CPUS to determine the upper 
>> bound on APIC IDs. e.g. my 3way is normally configured with NR_CPUS = 3 
>> but has APIC IDs of 0, 3 and 4. We need to make a distinction.

On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 09:18:12AM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> Fair enough. But that would seem to be a simpler operation than this patch.

It is not a simpler operation. It is the patch.

On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 09:18:12AM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> We break it out in subarch, but it's the same everywhere, which seems
> utterly useless - is probably historical cruft that needs to die.
> But that sounds like a separate issue, and a separate patch to me.

The change is correct. Let it stand.

On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 09:18:12AM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> Ugh, are you saying the cpumask stuff shrinks masks to < 32 bits if
> NR_CPUS is low enough? If so, I can see more point to the patch, but
> it still seems like violent overkill. Stopping it doing that would
> probably fix it ... I can't imagine it buys you much.

This change is also correct. Let it stand.

On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 09:18:12AM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> phys_cpu_present_map started off as an unsigned long, and I reused it
> in a fairly twisted way for NUMA-Q. As it's an array that's bounded
> by apic space, using the bios_cpu_apicid method that summit uses
> would be a much cleaner fix, and just leave the old one as a long
> bitmask like it used to be - which is fine for non- clustered apic
> systems, and saves inventing a whole new data type. See the
> cpu_present_to_apicid abstraction.

The precise thing this does is making phys_cpu_present_map an array
bounded by the APIC space. The change is correct. Let it stand.

At some point in the past, zwane wrote:
>> Urgh, it's really hard to determine what these functions really want half 
>> the time. But that change does look wrong.

On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 09:18:12AM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> Yeah, things taking logical apicids, and turning them into cpu numbers
> presumably shouldn't have to touch that.

The cpu bitmasks change width with NR_CPUS. The APIC ID spaces do not.
They must hence be bitmasks of separate widths. Hence the change is
correct. Let it stand.

-- wli