>
> Is it possible (safe) to use printk in atomic context, i.e. under
> spinlock or inside of preemption-disabled region?
>
> The same question about 2.4 (here I guess only spinlock?)
Yes you can, it's rather robust.
-- function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/