Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling broken

YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?ISO-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?= (yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org)
Fri, 11 Jul 2003 01:18:58 +0900 (JST)

In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307101906160.18224-100000@netcore.fi> (at Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:08:20 +0300 (EEST)), Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> says:

> While technically correct, I'm still not sure if this is (pragmatically)
> the correct approach. It's OK to set a default route to go to the
> subnet routers anycast address (so, setting a route to prefix:: should
> not give you EINVAL).

But, on the other side cannot use prefix::, and
the setting is rather non-sense.

We should educate people not to use /127; use /64 instead.
v6ops? :-)

-- 
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF  80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/