Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked

[Mika Liljeberg]

On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 07:51, Pekka Savola wrote:
> Well, the system may make some sense, but IMHO, there is still zero sense 
> in policing this thing when you add a route.  That's just plain bogus.  
> This is a bug which must be fixed ASAP.

Correct me if I'm wrong but I think in this case the interface had
forwarding enabled and the sanity check in fact prevented a default
route pointing to the node itself from being configured.

Otherwise I fully agree. The subnet router anycast address doesn't
warrant any special handling.

	MikaL