Re: egcs & 2.0.32
Adam Kumiszcza (Qman@NULL.net)
Sun, 07 Dec 1997 11:44:02 +0100
> Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@pointer.teuto.de> writes:
>
> > is egcs capable of compiling a working 2.0.32 kernel?
>
> I compiled the 2.0.32 kernel I'm currently running on with a
> snapshot of egcs prior to 1.0 release + pentium gcc patches.
>
> $ uptime
> 11:44pm up 19 days, 4:43, 15 users, load average: 0.06, 0.10, 0.20
>
> > Is there any speed difference?
>
> Yes! Pgcc speeds up XEmacs very noticeably at -O6, I compiled the
> kernel at a more modest optimization level (-O2), but everything
> seems faster. [...]
I've been using pgcc as my primary compiler for several months without problems. Many parts of my system (kernel, libc, binutils and many applications) are pentium optimized. I generally use -O6 -mpentium options (including compilation of kernels). I haven't noticed any kernel oops, or
anything like this (in stable kernels).
Unfortunately I can't give data about speed difference. I haven't measured it. But some applications' speed increases "visually" - no need to measure it ;)
Adam Kumiszcza
<Qman@NULL.net>