Re: PnP in 2.2

[Alan Cox]

> > [SNIP]  Not to say that the isapnp tools aren't good,
> > but they should at the very least be included in the kernel, to simplify
> > everyone's lives.  
> 
> Why put something that can be in userland in the kernel? My personal view
> is that the kernel should be as simple as possible and with as little
> policy as possible.

Why not look at the CVS snapshots and/or the other places the code you wish
to discuss are located - and then discuss it _after_ reading the source