Re: old_sigset_t vs sigset_t

David Woodhouse (dwmw2@cam.ac.uk)
Tue, 09 Dec 1997 13:43:03 +0000

flynnjs@mobility.bt.co.uk said:
> I've just gone from libc-5.4.33 -> 5.4.38 as this is what linuxhq
> suggests is needed for 2.1 - I'm (trying) to go 2.1 from today.

> Kerneld 2.1.55 and mount 2.7g fail to compile due to sigset_t

So does kerneld 2.1.71, more surprisingly.

-- 
----                              ----                              ----
David Woodhouse, Robinson College, CB3 9AN, England.   (+44) 0976 658355
	dwmw2@cam.ac.uk		http://dwmw2.robinson.cam.ac.uk
	    finger pgp@dwmw2.robinson.cam.ac.uk for PGP key.