Re: old_sigset_t vs sigset_t

[Bill Hawes]

C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> This is not so.  Check your header files.  The kernel change should not
> show up in user-mode applications.  There is/was a byte-endian thing that
> showed up in user-land in kernel 2.1.7[01?], but that was squashed.
> Somehow your user apps are using kernel headers.
> 
> > [..] I am running linux libc-5.4.33 [...]
> 
> I'm running 5.4.38 with no problems.
> 
> This list gets real silent when you report imaginary problems.

Scott,

Please have the courtesy to respect other people's problem reports.
Whether the problem is "real" or "imaginary" in the sense of something
being wrong with the kernel or library sources is irrelevant -- if it
fails to work for someone, it's a problem. The kernel list is here to
help people resolve problems.

FWIW, modutils 2.1.55 and 2.1.71 fails to build on my system as well
because of the recent changes in signal handling.

Regards,
Bill