Re: old_sigset_t vs sigset_t

[Myrdraal]

On Tue, Dec 09, 1997 at 01:43:03PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
Hi,
> [e-mail] said:
> > I've just gone from libc-5.4.33 -> 5.4.38 as this is what linuxhq
> > suggests is needed for 2.1 - I'm (trying) to go 2.1 from today.
> > Kerneld 2.1.55 and mount 2.7g fail to compile due to sigset_t 
> So does kerneld 2.1.71, more surprisingly.
Strangely enough, modutils 2.1.71 compiled without a hitch for me. Perhaps
it's because I use glibc?
 -Myrdraal