RE: Anatomy of a sigset_t

Garst R. Reese (reese@isn.net)
Tue, 09 Dec 1997 17:26:56 -0400


>From: "C. Scott Ananian" <cananian@lcs.mit.edu>
>Date: Tue, 9 Dec 1997 06:24:19 -0500 (EST)
>Subject: Anatomy of a sigset_t.

>People are complaining about code breakage with the new sigset_t.
>Correctly written code should *not* have problems.
>But I thought I'd take us all on a quick tour of signal.h to explain
>what's changed, and why it doesn't (shouldn't) matter --- and why some
>programs written by lousy programmers break.

[snip]
>Then why are people having compilation problems?

>Simple. Programmers are idiots.
Will all you lousy programmers and idiots that wrote Mount-2.7g, Bash,
Modutils etc.
please stand up and be counted , or are we dealing with an innumerable
set here:)

-- 
I just can't tolerate intolerance :>)