Linux-kernel mailing list archive 1998-10,: Re: 2.1.89 broken?

# Re: 2.1.89 broken?

Trond Eivind =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Glomsr=F8d?= (teg@pvv.ntnu.no)
10 Mar 1998 00:15:55 +0100

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: docwhat@gerf.org ;The Doctor What: "SPAM: suggestion for listowner"
- Previous message: Perry Harrington: "Re: SPAM on linux-kernel (was Re: Forwarded mail....)"

Scott Lampert <fortunato@heavymetal.org> writes:

> It works for me on my 233MMX, however it seems to be far
> less efficient than prior kernels when it comes to memory handling.
> It doesn't seem to want to give up much memory from the disk cache,
> prefering to stick stuff in swap first.

That is my experience as well... I've got 80 MB. It was happy with
about 56 MB for caches, 4 MB free and a little less than 20 MB
used. Oh - and 75 MB used swap.

    --
    Trond Eivind Glomsrød
    http://s9412a.steinan.ntnu.no/~teg/ ** teg@pvv.ntnu.no

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

- Next message: docwhat@gerf.org ;The Doctor What: "SPAM: suggestion for listowner"
- Previous message: Perry Harrington: "Re: SPAM on linux-kernel (was Re: Forwarded mail....)"