Linux-kernel mailing list archive 1998-10,: Re: pcmcia/2.1.89/90pre1/2

# Re: pcmcia/2.1.89/90pre1/2

Garst R. Reese (reese@isn.net)
Thu, 12 Mar 1998 17:38:28 -0400

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Viggo L. Norum: "Re: Samba compilation problem with 2.1.8x"
- Previous message: Lagos Munoz Leonardo Alberto: "Swap area: why not more than 128M each?"
- Maybe in reply to: Garst R. Reese: "pcmcia/2.1.89/90pre1/2"
- Next in thread: John Kennedy: "Re: pcmcia/2.1.89/90pre1/2"

John Kennedy wrote:
>
> 03/12/98 @ 11:56:02 AM (Thursday)
>
> [Garst R. Reese]
> > Does anybody have pcmcia working after 2.1.88? I patched ds.c for the
> > poll_wait, bit cardctl does not work and modprobe cannot find serial_cs.
> > Serial support is built in, not a module. pcmcia_cs-3.0.1Mar05
>
> That actually broke after pre-2.1.89-2. If you use the patch below and
> HUP the cardmgr daemon things seem to work normally. I haven't printf()ed
> the code to try and figure out where it's getting hung up.
>
> I mailed David Hinds about it before pcmcia-cs.03-Mar-98 and .05-Mar-98
> came out but it didn't work through linux-2.1.89. I tried it with the
> latest (currently pre-2.1.90-2) and ran into a bunch of problems with
> CONFIG_MAX_MEMSIZE being undeclared, so I'm going to have to figure
> that one out.
>
> I see that pcmcia-cs.12-Mar-98 is out, so I'll have to try that too.
>

> --- john
Thanks john, I just got 12-Mar. It complained about CONFIG_MAX_MEMSIZE
and stopped.
I edited pcm/include/linux/config.h and added:
#define CONFIG_MAX_MEMSIZE 1024
This is a new config option in 90-2, it popped up when I did make
oldconfig and I accepted the 1024 default since I have less than 1G mem
:( poor me :)
This is coming at you from 2.1.90-2, pcmcia-cs-12-Mar-98.
[snipped patch is obsolete]

    --
    Garst

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

- Next message: Viggo L. Norum: "Re: Samba compilation problem with 2.1.8x"
- Previous message: Lagos Munoz Leonardo Alberto: "Swap area: why not more than 128M each?"
- Maybe in reply to: Garst R. Reese: "pcmcia/2.1.89/90pre1/2"
- Next in thread: John Kennedy: "Re: pcmcia/2.1.89/90pre1/2"