Linux-kernel mailing list archive 1998-25,: Re: Secure-linux and standard kernel

# Re: Secure-linux and standard kernel

Krzysztof G. Baranowski (kgb@manjak.knm.org.pl)
Fri, 26 Jun 1998 18:41:25 +0200 (CEST)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Terry L Ridder: "Re: Weird spelling fixes in 2.1.107"
- Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Thread implementations..."
- Maybe in reply to: Doug Elznic: "Secure-linux and standard kernel"
- Next in thread: Vadim E. Kogan: "Re: Secure-linux and standard kernel"

On Fri, 26 Jun 1998, Pawel S. Veselov wrote:
> Why this can be optional ? At least, people, that are using this patch
> will be able to upgrade their kernels without waiting new patch version
> is released.
Why adding only this one, add 100 others as config options, so
people will be able to upgrade their kernels without waiting for
these 100 additional patches. As you can see this is not an argument.

Kris

    --
    Krzysztof G. Baranowski - President of the Harmless Manyacs' Club
    "Smith & Wesson - The original point and click interface..."
    http://www.knm.org.pl/                 <prezes@manjak.knm.org.pl>

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

- Next message: Terry L Ridder: "Re: Weird spelling fixes in 2.1.107"
- Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Thread implementations..."
- Maybe in reply to: Doug Elznic: "Secure-linux and standard kernel"
- Next in thread: Vadim E. Kogan: "Re: Secure-linux and standard kernel"