Linux-kernel mailing list archive 1998-31,: Re: Irritating ext2fs corruption

# Re: Irritating ext2fs corruption

Nix (nix-kernel@esperi.demon.co.uk)
Sun, 2 Aug 1998 22:26:56 +0100 (BST)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Andrew Derrick Balsa: "Re: kernel compile time comparison (2.0 vs 2.1 with 64MB)"
- Previous message: Gadi Oxman: "Re: !!Warning!! UDMA and Fujitsu HD"

Andrea Arcangeli writes:
> You should launch `telinit u`, kill all your process (except init), and
> then everything should be really deleted for sure.

You must kill init too to be sure that *everything* is gone, if init
is dynamically linked to the libc. (This only applies if you've
recently - i.e., since the last fsck/downtime - upgraded your libc.)

    --
    `in usenet, anything better than "brought to its knees every five
     minutes" is good' - fwei

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

- Next message: Andrew Derrick Balsa: "Re: kernel compile time comparison (2.0 vs 2.1 with 64MB)"
- Previous message: Gadi Oxman: "Re: !!Warning!! UDMA and Fujitsu HD"