Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds
David S. Miller (davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com)
Tue, 4 Aug 1998 09:13:36 -0700
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: ralf@uni-koblenz.de: "Re: NFS problem"
- Previous message: Erik Andersen: "Re: video4linux, Hauppauge: no sound"
- Maybe in reply to: Zachary Amsden: "[PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
- Next in thread: Jon Lewis: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
- Reply: Jon Lewis: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
- Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
- Reply: ©K@ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
From: "Peter T. Breuer" <ptb@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 13:01:49 +0200 (MET DST)
"A month of sundays ago Alan Cox wrote:"
>
> Actually a _lot_ of people run the non-excutable stack and related
> patches. They don't break anything, they stop a lot of the "I read bugtraq
As I remember, they broke gdb.
I saw some other funny effects later and backed them out.
They also break the trampolines emmited naturally by gcc.
Alan, this and for other reasons are why I think they should be
seperate patch sets, never in the mainline.
Later,
David S. Miller
davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
- Next message: ralf@uni-koblenz.de: "Re: NFS problem"
- Previous message: Erik Andersen: "Re: video4linux, Hauppauge: no sound"
- Maybe in reply to: Zachary Amsden: "[PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
- Next in thread: Jon Lewis: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
- Reply: Jon Lewis: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
- Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
- Reply: ©K@ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"