Re: 2.1.114 fails build on i386

Martin Mares (mj@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz)
Tue, 4 Aug 1998 20:24:45 +0200

> That's not what I'm going to use. I wanted the SMP stuff to be "close" to
> the other process priorities etc, for cache reasons. I've added a dummy
> "gcc_is_buggy" entry to the UP spinlock, and while it will never be used
> it at least will allow buggy compilers to compile the thing.

It would be probably wise to add this field only for GCC 2.7.X as both
2.8.X and egcs process empty initializers correctly.

Have a nice fortnight

-- 
Martin `MJ' Mares   <mj@ucw.cz>   http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/
Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth
"Bad command or operator..."


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html