Re: 2.1.114 fails build on i386

Michael Nelson (nelson@seahunt.imat.com)
Tue, 4 Aug 1998 20:28:39 +0000 ( )

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> wrote:
->
-> That's not what I'm going to use. I wanted the SMP stuff to be "close" to
-> the other process priorities etc, for cache reasons. I've added a dummy
-> "gcc_is_buggy" entry to the UP spinlock, and while it will never be used
-> it at least will allow buggy compilers to compile the thing.

What _is_ your officially approved compiler these days? I was under the
impression it was gcc-2.7.2.3. What do YOU use to compile the kernel?

Thanks...

Michael

--
		 "Life is not a dress rehearsal" -- unknown


Michael Nelson                               Home:       nelson@imat.com
San Francisco, CA                            Work:  michaeln@csd.sgi.com


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html