Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)

[david parsons]

In article <[e-mail]>,
Terry L Ridder  <[e-mail]> wrote:
>Hello Everyone;
>
>Let put this is really simple terms:
>
>1. Companies, clients, and I like the current naming conventions, and
>want
>to keep using the current naming conventions.
>
>2. What advantage does dev_fs offer us over the present system?

    /dev entries don't exist for nonexistant devices, and
    do exist for existing devices.

                  ____
    david parsons \bi/ Obswoon: swoon.
                   \/