Linux-kernel mailing list archive 1998-31,: Re: IDE drive data transfer rates, kernel optimization?

# Re: IDE drive data transfer rates, kernel optimization?

Mike A. Harris (mharris@ican.net)
Wed, 5 Aug 1998 17:05:42 -0400 (EDT)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Theodore Y. Ts'o: "Re: ext2 corruption. How to remove the result."
- Previous message: Chad C Giffin: "Re: MULTIPLE COPIES OF KERNEL DIGEST ... getting worse !!!"
- In reply to: Meelis Roos: "Re: IDE drive data transfer rates, kernel optimization?"

On Wed, 5 Aug 1998, Meelis Roos wrote:

> MAH> Further inspection of the datasheet indicates that the drive has
> MAH> an internal buffer size of 128k. When I do an "hdparm -i" on the
> MAH> drive, it indicates:
> [...]
> MAH> As you can see, it says "BuffSize=80kB". That is NOT 128k for
> MAH> sure.
>
> Part of the 128 KB is used internally as a data area for the firmware.

Then the PDF should say:

80kb buffer, 48k internal data area... That is my opinion
anyways, otherwise it is nothing more than marketing ploy...

    --
    Mike A. Harris  -  Computer Consultant  -  Linux advocate

    Escape from the confines of Microsoft's operating systems and push your
    PC to it's limits with LINUX - a real OS. http://www.redhat.com

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

- Next message: Theodore Y. Ts'o: "Re: ext2 corruption. How to remove the result."
- Previous message: Chad C Giffin: "Re: MULTIPLE COPIES OF KERNEL DIGEST ... getting worse !!!"
- In reply to: Meelis Roos: "Re: IDE drive data transfer rates, kernel optimization?"