Linux-kernel mailing list archive 1998-31,: Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)

# Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)

H. Peter Anvin (hpa@transmeta.com)
6 Aug 1998 08:38:30 GMT

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113"
- Previous message: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113"
- Maybe in reply to: Shawn Leas: "DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)"
- Next in thread: Anthony Barbachan: "Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)"

Followup to: <199808060119.LAA01437@vindaloo.atnf.CSIRO.AU>
By author: Richard Gooch <Richard.Gooch@atnf.CSIRO.AU>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Andrea Arcangeli writes:
> > On Wed, 5 Aug 1998, Shawn Leas wrote:
> >
> > >In saying waiting, I wasn't meaning the human style foot tapping, coffee
> > >getting, *long wait* that it might have sounded like. I meant that little
> > >bit of time spent is unnecessary. Bigger deal for some than others, no?
> >
> > You really don' t understand that the inode lookup time is not an issue.
> > Please really stop using it as and argument in favor of devfs.
>
> How long does it take to lookup a million inodes? This is not
> significant?
>

Unless your filesystem is crummy for directory lookup (which ext2fs
currently is, but that is the problem that should be fixed), it
shouldn't be significant. Counter question: how much kernel memory
does it take to keep a million devices with all their info (atime,
mtime, ctime, permissions, ownership all included!)

-hpa

    --
        PGP: 2047/2A960705 BA 03 D3 2C 14 A8 A8 BD  1E DF FE 69 EE 35 BD 74
        See http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/ for web page and full PGP public key
            I am Bahá'í -- ask me about it or see http://www.bahai.org/
       "To love another person is to see the face of God." -- Les Misérables

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

- Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113"
- Previous message: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113"
- Maybe in reply to: Shawn Leas: "DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)"
- Next in thread: Anthony Barbachan: "Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)"