Linux-kernel mailing list archive 1998-31,: Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)

# Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)

Michael L. Galbraith (mikeg@weiden.de)
Sat, 8 Aug 1998 15:30:49 +0200 (CEST)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)"
- Previous message: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer: "Re: 2.1.115 IDE-DRIVER Suggested Update"
- In reply to: Shawn Leas: "Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)"

On Fri, 7 Aug 1998, Shawn Leas wrote:

> On Fri, 7 Aug 1998, Richard Gooch wrote:
> > Terry L. Ridder writes:
> > > Hello Richard;
> > >
> > > I have come to the conclusion that Theodore was correct when
> > > he said there was little use in discussing this.
>
> > That's your decision. However, I'll point out that Theo seemed to be
> > more concerned with the tendancy for flaming in a devfs thread and the
> > bandwidth that would consume.
> > At no point in this discussion have I flamed or resorted to personal
> > attacks. Nor have I ever implied that someone has strange ways of
> > thinking because their view differs from mine.
>
> Yep, don't detract from devfs on my account, sometimes I just can't help
> myself!

Damn poor excuse for calling a man who has devoted as much time and
effort to Linux as Ted has an `idiot' IMNSHO. If you sent that gem
from a Linux box, you used some of his code to slap him in the face.

I just can't help myself.

-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

- Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)"
- Previous message: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer: "Re: 2.1.115 IDE-DRIVER Suggested Update"
- In reply to: Shawn Leas: "Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)"