Linux-kernel mailing list archive 1998-31, by author

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]

Starting: Sun 02 Aug 1998 - 00:00:47 EET DST
Ending: Sat 08 Aug 1998 - 23:57:56 EET DST
Messages: 1445

• =?ISO-8859-1?Q?
  • [PATCH] Aha1542 - Fixes problems with dma0 Wed, 5 Aug 1998 09:32:26 -0000
  • [PATCH] Aha1542 - Fixes problems with dma0 Wed, 5 Aug 1998 09:32:26 -0000
  • [PATCH] Aha1542 - Fixes problems with dma0 Wed, 5 Aug 1998 09:32:26 -0000
• =?iso-8859-1?Q?Johan_Myr=E9en?=
  • Re: xterm: no available ptys - 115 Sat, 8 Aug 1998 09:58:49 +0300 (EET DST)
  • Re: OFFTOPIC? PTY related question in 2.1.115 Fri, 7 Aug 1998 21:58:12 +0300 (EET DST)
• =?iso-8859-1?Q?menion=99?=
  • Re: SCSI tape driver Fri, 07 Aug 1998 11:45:08 -0600
• A. Wik
  • Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Tue, 04 Aug 1998 12:14:53 +0000
• Aaron J. Grier
  • Re: Compiler alternatives to no-exec (was Re: non exec stack...) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 12:03:39 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 13:22:23 -0700
• Aaron M. Ucko
  • Re: No more connection to internet after Kernel 2.1.113 07 Aug 1998 13:13:51 -0400
  • Re: No more connection to internet after Kernel 2.1.113 06 Aug 1998 13:22:45 -0400
  • Re: Compiling new kernel 06 Aug 1998 16:10:53 -0400
• Aaron Tiensivu
  • Re: 2.1.114 VFS code 5x slower than 2.0.33?!? Fri, 7 Aug 1998 05:15:08 -0400
  • Re: Unmask IRQ safe? Fri, 7 Aug 1998 05:05:54 -0400
  • Re: TX-PRO chipset Wed, 5 Aug 1998 15:03:44 -0400
  • Re: gcc 2.7.1 Wed, 5 Aug 1998 18:04:37 -0400
  • Re: IDE drive data transfer rates, kernel optimization? Wed, 5 Aug 1998 17:59:13 -0400
• Abhijit Lahiri
  • (no subject) Sun, 2 Aug 1998 11:24:33 +0530 (IST)
• Achim Leubner
  • A problem with SMP Fri, 7 Aug 1998 15:38:18 +0200
• Alan Cox
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 13:55:47 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: devfs Sat, 8 Aug 1998 12:32:20 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 12:19:51 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: rshaper-1.01, for linux-2.0 Sat, 8 Aug 1998 12:07:55 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: VFAT patch (Re: 2.1.114: VFAT corrupts first block of a file) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 12:03:52 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: 2.1.114 VFS code 5x slower than 2.0.33?!? Sat, 8 Aug 1998 01:20:43 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 22:15:34 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: rshaper-1.01, for linux-2.0 Fri, 7 Aug 1998 20:29:38 +0100 (BST)
  • Linux 2.1.115ac1 released Fri, 7 Aug 1998 20:57:49 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Stack Smashing and no-exec Fri, 7 Aug 1998 20:02:09 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: rshaper-1.01, for linux-2.0 Fri, 7 Aug 1998 19:49:38 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: SCSI tape driver Fri, 7 Aug 1998 19:45:44 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: devfs Fri, 7 Aug 1998 19:44:17 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 17:06:58 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Antw: Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Fri, 7 Aug 1998 16:19:20 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: IDE drive data transfer rates, kernel optimization? Fri, 7 Aug 1998 14:47:44 +0100 (BST)
  • The 2.1.11x showstopper list Fri, 7 Aug 1998 14:04:13 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Idea to make a kickass TCP read! Fri, 7 Aug 1998 13:52:16 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Stack Smashing and no-exec Fri, 7 Aug 1998 13:44:07 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: devfs Fri, 7 Aug 1998 13:24:12 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Idea to make a kickass TCP read! Fri, 7 Aug 1998 01:37:11 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Thu, 6 Aug 1998 20:52:41 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 22:18:14 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 08:33:19 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 08:22:14 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 08:01:39 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 02:31:38 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: radio freqs (was: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 01:24:09 +0100 (BST)
  • Security Patches (was Re: [PATCH].. blah) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 23:03:40 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 22:00:12 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 22:14:55 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 22:30:11 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 22:23:36 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 22:03:02 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: video4linux problem (was problem compiling 2.1.109/112) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 21:55:51 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 22:07:06 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 21:55:20 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 18:36:29 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:38:26 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 13:15:48 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: malloc()? vmalloc()? kmalloc()? Tue, 4 Aug 1998 13:24:56 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 10:21:13 +0100 (BST)
  • 2.0.36pre2 Tue, 4 Aug 98 02:59 BST
  • Re: RS-485 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 00:24:37 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: 2.1.114 linux/include/linux/sched.h problem - followup Tue, 4 Aug 1998 00:22:33 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Races in open(2) Mon, 3 Aug 1998 20:41:57 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: !!Warning!! UDMA and Fujitsu HD Mon, 3 Aug 1998 14:51:42 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: struct ucred change in 2.1.113 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 13:06:31 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Mon, 3 Aug 1998 13:03:13 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: es1370 broken as non-module Mon, 3 Aug 1998 12:47:33 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Crash with 2.0.33 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 12:46:26 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Mon, 3 Aug 1998 12:58:48 +0100 (BST)
• Albert D. Cahalan
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 18:31:57 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 18:18:54 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 17:29:49 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 14:10:04 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Wed, 5 Aug 1998 14:12:58 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 04:15:28 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 00:35:01 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 23:25:49 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 18:50:13 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:27:00 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:04:46 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: devfs compatibility Tue, 4 Aug 1998 05:05:33 -0400 (EDT)
  • devfs compatibility Tue, 4 Aug 1998 03:48:43 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Linux version 2.1.113 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 16:10:02 -0400 (EDT)
• Alberto Vignani
  • PTYs in 2.1.115 Sat, 08 Aug 1998 01:32:16 +0200
• Alessandro Rubini
  • Re: rshaper-1.01, for linux-2.0 Sat, 8 Aug 1998 20:55:01 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: rshaper-1.01, for linux-2.0 Fri, 7 Aug 1998 21:30:27 +0200 (MET DST)
  • rshaper-1.01, for linux-2.0 Fri, 7 Aug 1998 14:21:32 +0200
• Alex Buell
  • HOWTO-framebuffer v0.13 released! :o) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 03:16:24 -0400 (EWT)
  • Re: 2.1.115: ptys broken Sat, 8 Aug 1998 01:28:06 -0400 (EWT)
  • Bob Tracey -- URGENT Fri, 7 Aug 1998 23:40:14 -0400 (EWT)
  • Re: pseudo-tty problems w/2.1.115 Fri, 7 Aug 1998 22:35:24 -0400 (EWT)
  • Re: Antw: Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Fri, 7 Aug 1998 22:24:35 -0400 (EWT)
  • Re: [patch] vesafb panning: scrollback support and nice speedup Fri, 7 Aug 1998 23:32:23 -0400 (EWT)
  • Re: Stack Smashing and no-exec Fri, 7 Aug 1998 14:43:52 -0400 (EWT)
  • HOWTO-framebuffer v0.12 out now! :o) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 13:23:12 -0400 (EWT)
  • Matrox BIOS upgrades (Was Re: [patch] vesafb panning: scrollback Fri, 7 Aug 1998 11:16:59 -0400 (EWT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 01:32:55 -0400 (EWT)
  • Re: [patch] vesafb panning: scrollback support and nice speedup Fri, 7 Aug 1998 01:49:15 -0400 (EWT)
  • Re: Matrox Mill/Myst Thu, 6 Aug 1998 13:06:00 -0400 (EWT)
  • HOWTO-framebuffer v0.11 released! Thu, 6 Aug 1998 13:03:28 -0400 (EWT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 10:50:47 -0400 (EWT)
  • HOWTO-framebuffer v0.10 out Wed, 5 Aug 1998 23:27:50 -0400 (EWT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 00:46:03 -0400 (EWT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 00:35:55 -0400 (EWT)
  • Re: devfs compatibility Tue, 4 Aug 1998 11:10:02 -0400 (EWT)
  • YES!!!! 2.1.113 has buffer scrollback working! :o) + fresh HOWTO Tue, 4 Aug 1998 00:35:15 -0400 (EWT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 00:19:49 -0400 (EWT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Mon, 3 Aug 1998 23:00:56 -0400 (EWT)
  • Re: 2.1.113 fails to compile Mon, 3 Aug 1998 22:44:03 -0400 (EWT)
  • Calling all non-Intel platform Linux users Mon, 3 Aug 1998 15:14:19 -0400 (EWT)
  • 2.1.113 fails to compile Mon, 3 Aug 1998 10:24:35 -0400 (EWT)
  • vesafb-HOWTO v0.6 released Mon, 3 Aug 1998 09:40:35 -0400 (EWT)
  • HOWTO vesafb v0.5 Sun, 2 Aug 1998 21:53:09 -0400 (EWT)
  • HOWTO-vesafb v0.5 Sun, 2 Aug 1998 13:35:12 -0400 (EWT)
  • X11 screen corruption with vgacon stuff problems. Sat, 1 Aug 1998 23:14:52 -0400 (EWT)
• Alexander Kjeldaas
  • Re: Antw: Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Sat, 8 Aug 1998 18:10:12 +0200
  • International patch for 2.0 Thu, 6 Aug 1998 15:55:15 +0200
  • Re: TCP/IP Routing by user id? Tue, 4 Aug 1998 19:29:36 +0200
  • Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Tue, 4 Aug 1998 19:01:25 +0200
  • Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Tue, 4 Aug 1998 18:52:21 +0200
  • Re: core dumps when uid has been changed since exec Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:43:48 +0200
  • Re: Looking for 4-way Xeon patches Mon, 3 Aug 1998 10:42:10 +0200
  • Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Mon, 3 Aug 1998 10:35:57 +0200
• Alexander V. Lukyanov
  • 2.1.115 on alpha: fix for csi_X Fri, 7 Aug 1998 17:36:59 +0400
  • linux-2.1.115 on alpha: bug in memsetw_io (or memset_c_io) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 15:52:52 +0400
• Alexandr D. Kanevskiy
  • [FIX] PPP+af_netlink+af_packet >2.1.109 fix. (tcpdump and trafshow) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 00:47:24 +0300 (EEST)
  • VESA FB & PIO_FONTX Sun, 2 Aug 1998 18:51:18 +0300 (EEST)
• Alistair Riddell
  • RE: Corruption Stats (fwd) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 19:50:58 +0100 (BST)
• Allan Hsu
  • [OFFTOPIC] duplicates? Wed, 5 Aug 1998 02:07:27 -0400
  • 2.1.X sound? Tue, 4 Aug 1998 22:50:31 -0400
• Anders Hammarquist
  • Re: Kernel NFS and solaris machines Wed, 5 Aug 1998 03:04:11 +0200
• Andi Kleen
  • Re: rshaper-1.01, for linux-2.0 08 Aug 1998 16:56:13 +0200
  • Re: 2.1.114 VFS code 5x slower than 2.0.33?!? 07 Aug 1998 22:41:09 +0200
  • Re: Idea to make a kickass TCP read! 07 Aug 1998 14:59:52 +0200
  • Re: 2.1.114 VFS code 5x slower than 2.0.33?!? 07 Aug 1998 14:52:05 +0200
  • Re: Idea to make a kickass TCP read 07 Aug 1998 15:32:03 +0200
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 06 Aug 1998 17:50:47 +0200
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Thu, 6 Aug 1998 16:00:00 +0200
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Thu, 6 Aug 1998 15:00:52 +0200
  • Re: 2.1.115-4 and SPARC64 06 Aug 1998 13:43:57 +0200
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Thu, 6 Aug 1998 04:18:36 +0200
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 06 Aug 1998 02:32:58 +0200
  • Re: new networking code, ipv4/arp.c and net/core/neighbour.c Thu, 6 Aug 1998 01:23:18 +0200
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) 05 Aug 1998 15:02:33 +0200
  • Re: ftp trouble 2.1.114 <> Cray-System 04 Aug 1998 21:45:50 +0200
  • Re: Patch for faster interrupt handling. Tue, 4 Aug 1998 22:39:26 +0200
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) 04 Aug 1998 16:34:54 +0200
  • Re: Patch for faster interrupt handling. Tue, 4 Aug 1998 15:47:00 +0200
  • Re: Plip timeout errors 04 Aug 1998 04:37:58 +0200
  • Patch for faster interrupt handling. Tue, 4 Aug 1998 04:47:35 +0200
  • Re: 2.1.114 linux/include/linux/sched.h problem - followup 04 Aug 1998 01:26:28 +0200
• Andre Derrick Balsa
  • Re: kernel compile time comparison (2.0 vs 2.1 with 64MB) Mon, 03 Aug 1998 04:44:36 +0200
• Andre M. Hedrick
  • Re: 2.1.115 IDE-DRIVER Suggested Update Sat, 8 Aug 1998 11:21:58 -0500 (CDT)
  • 2.1.115 IDE-DRIVER Suggested Update Fri, 7 Aug 1998 16:57:05 -0500 (CDT)
  • NO WARS, PLEASE!!!!!!!! (RE: 10 of 12 IDE-Devices...) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 13:44:36 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: 10 of 12 IDE-Devices :: Believe IT or NOT Fri, 7 Aug 1998 13:16:57 -0500 (CDT)
  • USB (was Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 11:18:23 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: 10 of 12 IDE-Devices :: Believe IT or NOT Fri, 7 Aug 1998 11:36:02 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: What's a good SMP MB Manufacturer? Fri, 7 Aug 1998 01:35:44 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 23:33:06 -0500 (CDT)
  • 10 of 12 IDE-Devices :: Believe IT or NOT Thu, 6 Aug 1998 23:20:39 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 17:43:26 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: IDE-DRIVER Suggested Update Thu, 6 Aug 1998 12:12:46 -0500 (CDT)
  • IDE-DRIVER Suggested Update Wed, 5 Aug 1998 13:52:54 -0500 (CDT)
  • IDE-DRIVER Suggested Update Wed, 5 Aug 1998 11:20:10 -0500 (CDT)
  • 2.1.114 SMP Keyboard timeout?? Tue, 4 Aug 1998 00:18:18 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: !!Warning!! UDMA and Fujitsu HD Mon, 3 Aug 1998 12:34:13 -0500 (CDT)
  • 2.0.35 :: Translate "Oops" of removing a procfs entry. Sun, 2 Aug 1998 23:29:23 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Compile fails 2.1.113 "trm290.c" Sun, 2 Aug 1998 21:05:37 -0500 (CDT)
• Andrea Arcangeli
  • Re: 3c509.c and MCA Sat, 8 Aug 1998 17:07:35 +0200 (CEST)
  • start_kernel take no param Sat, 8 Aug 1998 16:59:36 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: 2.1.114 VFS code 5x slower than 2.0.33?!? Sat, 8 Aug 1998 15:45:28 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 16:05:10 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 14:29:03 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 12:51:14 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: page_alloc strange mask += mask Thu, 6 Aug 1998 14:49:53 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 03:46:57 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 03:13:12 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 02:07:07 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 02:59:20 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 02:33:02 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: is this fs corruption? Thu, 6 Aug 1998 02:01:21 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 01:35:01 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 19:30:50 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 16:45:40 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Strange interrupt behaviour Wed, 5 Aug 1998 18:18:00 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 18:01:38 +0200 (CEST)
  • is this fs corruption? Wed, 5 Aug 1998 14:37:18 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 13:29:44 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 13:23:23 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 13:05:59 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 02:48:45 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: profile patch for 2.1.114 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 21:39:11 +0200 (CEST)
  • profile patch for 2.1.114 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:31:11 +0200 (CEST)
  • bios32 patch against 2.1.114 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 03:25:07 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: page_alloc strange mask += mask Mon, 3 Aug 1998 20:39:05 +0200 (CEST)
  • page_alloc strange mask += mask Mon, 3 Aug 1998 16:38:09 +0200 (CEST)
  • i386 cosmetic patches Mon, 3 Aug 1998 02:43:09 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Irritating ext2fs corruption Sun, 2 Aug 1998 17:15:21 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: 2.1.111: IDE DMA disabled? Sun, 2 Aug 1998 02:33:42 +0200 (CEST)
• Andreas Jellinghaus
  • core dump and threads Fri, 7 Aug 1998 22:19:26 +0200
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 09:55:47 +0200
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 11:42:55 +0200
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 11:42:55 +0200
• Andreas Schwab
  • Re: can select with infinite timeout return 0 07 Aug 1998 11:45:55 +0200
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 07 Aug 1998 11:33:31 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix to make check_pgt_cache work on !i386 architectures 05 Aug 1998 11:46:16 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix to make check_pgt_cache work on !i386 architectures 05 Aug 1998 11:46:16 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix to make check_pgt_cache work on !i386 architectures 03 Aug 1998 11:16:43 +0200
• Andrej Presern
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Fri, 7 Aug 1998 23:39:50 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Thu, 6 Aug 1998 14:05:48 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Thu, 6 Aug 1998 01:20:16 +0200
• Andrew Derrick Balsa
  • Re: 6x86 recognition Sat, 08 Aug 1998 09:30:11 +0200
  • Re: gcc 2.7.1 Thu, 6 Aug 1998 19:20:20 +0200
  • Re: !!Warning!! UDMA and Fujitsu HD Mon, 3 Aug 1998 19:53:00 +0200
  • Re: kernel compile time comparison (2.0 vs 2.1 with 64MB) Mon, 3 Aug 1998 19:10:44 +0200
  • Re: kernel compile time comparison (2.0 vs 2.1 with 64MB) Mon, 3 Aug 1998 13:19:00 +0200
  • Re: kernel compile time comparison (2.0 vs 2.1 with 64MB) Mon, 03 Aug 1998 09:05:24 +0000
  • Re: CyrixInstead ? Sun, 02 Aug 1998 12:13:34 +0000
• Andrew J. Anderson
  • more matrox/vesafb problem data points Sat, 8 Aug 1998 13:08:41 -0400 (EDT)
  • 2.1.115 sound (gus) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 00:22:34 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 10:58:18 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: devfs debate Wed, 5 Aug 1998 15:03:15 -0400 (EDT)
  • devfs debate Wed, 5 Aug 1998 09:28:16 -0400 (EDT)
• Andrew McNamara
  • Bug in 2.1 loop block dev? Fri, 07 Aug 1998 21:55:42 +1000
• Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
  • 3c509.c and MCA Sat, 8 Aug 1998 16:17:09 +0200 (MET DST)
  • [PATCH] loop.c, keyboard.c, trm290.c Sat, 8 Aug 1998 01:24:04 +0200 (MET DST)
  • [PATCH] ibmmca.c + CREDITS Thu, 6 Aug 1998 12:31:00 +0200 (MET DST)
  • fb and kdev_t Wed, 5 Aug 1998 22:58:34 +0200 (MET DST)
  • [PATCH] ide patchlet Wed, 5 Aug 1998 22:13:43 +0200 (MET DST)
  • [PATCH] keyboard.c Wed, 5 Aug 1998 17:07:47 +0200 (MET DST)
  • mount-2.8a Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:49:21 +0200 (MET DST)
• Andy Sloane
  • Re: can select with infinite timeout return 0 Fri, 7 Aug 1998 00:12:08 -0500
  • Re: can select with infinite timeout return 0 Thu, 6 Aug 1998 13:42:41 -0500
• Anil B. Somayaji
  • es1370 broken as non-module 02 Aug 1998 18:48:22 -0600
• Anthony Barbachan
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 20:58:21 -0400
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 20:49:01 -0400
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 21:35:27 -0400
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 02:02:55 -0400
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 00:20:36 -0400
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 23:59:29 -0400
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 23:56:34 -0400
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 23:51:03 -0400
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 23:42:51 -0400
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 23:28:49 -0400
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 23:18:39 -0400
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 22:37:31 -0400
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 05:41:19 -0400
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 05:20:57 -0400
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 04:55:12 -0400
  • Re: Does linux support 8-sector floppies? Mon, 3 Aug 1998 18:10:23 -0400
  • Re: !!Warning!! UDMA and Fujitsu HD Mon, 3 Aug 1998 17:53:27 -0400
• Anthony DeStefano
  • SCSI tape driver Thu, 6 Aug 1998 18:50:28 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
• Arnaud Installe
  • Oops with isofs on Alpha Tue, 4 Aug 1998 01:16:16 +0200
• Arup Mukherjee
  • 2.1.x -- premature SIGIO for socket write()'s? Fri, 7 Aug 1998 11:45:27 -0400
• Axel Eble
  • Antw: Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Fri, 07 Aug 1998 11:49:38 +0200
  • Antw: Re: 2.1.113: still an SMP related oops at boot time Sun, 02 Aug 1998 15:44:42 +0200
• Azog
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] duplicates? Thu, 6 Aug 1998 13:21:13 -0500
• Barry Treahy
  • Re: gcc 2.7.2.3 vs gcc 2.8.1 -- DUPLICATES Wed, 05 Aug 1998 14:42:03 -0700
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] duplicates? Wed, 05 Aug 1998 16:19:37 -0700
• Ben Lavender
  • Newbie please help. I need a Boot-floopy with new AIC7xxxx (ahc) driver for Linux Slackware 3.5 on Intel Sun, 2 Aug 1998 20:54:49 +0100
  • Newbie help! Adaptec AIC7890 - AIC7xxxx (ahc) driver for Linux Slackware 3.5 Sat, 1 Aug 1998 21:54:21 +0100
• Ben Pfaff
  • Re: ext2 corruption?? 06 Aug 1998 10:37:41 -0400
  • Re: mtrr 02 Aug 1998 12:24:30 -0400
• Benjamin Redelings I
  • Upgrading matrox drivers doesn't fix problems with 2.1.115 vesafb Fri, 07 Aug 1998 21:06:41 -0700
  • Re: what is a .pax file ? Thu, 06 Aug 1998 08:59:51 -0700
  • [2.1.115] Works fine for me.... (is list down?!?!) Tue, 04 Aug 1998 19:05:38 -0700
• Benjamin Saller Bender
  • Able to crash userspace with debugger in 2.1.113 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 13:33:27 -0400 (EDT)
• Benny Amorsen
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) 08 Aug 1998 09:42:49 +0200
• Bernd Paysan
  • Linux boot logo Fri, 7 Aug 1998 21:44:37 +0200 (MET DST)
• Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
  • Re: 2.1.115 IDE-DRIVER Suggested Update Sat, 8 Aug 1998 14:25:43 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: aha2940 still not seeing devices Sun, 2 Aug 1998 11:54:20 +0200 (CEST)
• Bill Broadhurst
  • Re: 2.1.113: still an SMP related oops at boot time Sat, 1 Aug 1998 17:34:28 -0700
• Bill Hawes
  • patch for 2.1.115 wabi problem Sat, 08 Aug 1998 10:18:55 -0700
  • Re: output of ksymoops for wabi bug ... Sat, 08 Aug 1998 08:44:23 -0700
  • Re: output of ksymoops for wabi bug ... Fri, 07 Aug 1998 20:22:17 -0700
  • Re: 2.1.114 VFS code 5x slower than 2.0.33?!? Fri, 07 Aug 1998 10:53:05 -0700
  • Re: [2.1.113] What is CHECK_TTY_COUNT warning me about? Fri, 07 Aug 1998 09:12:05 -0700
  • Re: [2.1.113] What is CHECK_TTY_COUNT warning me about? Fri, 07 Aug 1998 09:02:55 -0700
  • Re: [2.1.113] What is CHECK_TTY_COUNT warning me about? Thu, 06 Aug 1998 21:48:15 -0700
  • Re: [2.1.113] What is CHECK_TTY_COUNT warning me about? Thu, 06 Aug 1998 11:09:30 -0700
  • Re: Massive NFS client errors in 2.1.111 Thu, 06 Aug 1998 11:03:22 -0700
  • Minor PCI config problem in 2.1.114 Mon, 03 Aug 1998 15:59:00 -0700
  • Re: SMBFS: Question... Mon, 03 Aug 1998 13:08:24 -0700
  • Re: Races in open(2) Mon, 03 Aug 1998 11:34:48 -0700
  • Re: SMP code and uniprocessor Sun, 02 Aug 1998 14:44:27 -0700
  • patch for alpha osf_sys -- please test! Sat, 01 Aug 1998 15:14:51 -0700
  • Updated misc mem patch for 2.1.113 Sat, 01 Aug 1998 15:03:21 -0700
  • patch for 2.1.113 fs/lockd/svc.c Sat, 01 Aug 1998 14:24:47 -0700
• Bob Lorenzini
  • xterm: no available ptys - 115 Fri, 7 Aug 1998 08:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: MULTIPLE COPIES OF KERNEL DIGEST ... getting worse !!! Wed, 5 Aug 1998 17:07:18 -0700 (PDT)
• Bob Nielsen
  • Re: ONE PATCH TO COMPILE 2.1.114 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 09:30:17 -0700 (MST)
• Bob Taylor
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 06 Aug 1998 00:43:29 -0700
• Bob_Tracy
  • pseudo-tty problems w/2.1.115: followup Fri, 7 Aug 1998 14:22:36 -0500 (CDT)
  • pseudo-tty problems w/2.1.115 Fri, 7 Aug 1998 13:54:02 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: 2.1.114 fails build on i386 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 21:26:22 -0500 (CDT)
  • 2.1.114 linux/include/linux/sched.h problem - followup Mon, 3 Aug 1998 17:10:07 -0500 (CDT)
  • 2.1.114 linux/include/linux/sched.h problem Mon, 3 Aug 1998 16:52:10 -0500 (CDT)
• Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 07 Aug 1998 18:23:56 -0300
  • Re: [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Thu, 06 Aug 1998 19:09:30 -0300
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Thu, 06 Aug 1998 18:44:21 -0300
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 06 Aug 1998 17:08:28 -0300
  • Re: what is a .pax file ? Thu, 06 Aug 1998 17:23:28 -0300
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 04 Aug 1998 21:41:59 -0300
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 04 Aug 1998 21:23:03 -0300
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 04 Aug 1998 21:07:47 -0300
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 04 Aug 1998 20:29:23 -0300
  • Re: Irritating ext2fs corruption Mon, 03 Aug 1998 20:15:07 -0300
• Brendan Cully
  • no vm-86: BAD Sat, 1 Aug 1998 19:28:26 -0400
• Brian Almeida
  • Re: More oops detail Fri, 7 Aug 1998 06:42:02 -0400
  • More oops detail Thu, 6 Aug 1998 19:14:55 -0400
• Brion Vibber
  • Re: [RAPIDLY GOING OFFTOPIC] Re: SMBFS: Question... Wed, 05 Aug 1998 04:36:00 -0700
  • [RAPIDLY GOING OFFTOPIC] Re: SMBFS: Question... Tue, 04 Aug 1998 23:40:08 -0700
  • [RAPIDLY GOING OFFTOPIC] Re: SMBFS: Question... Tue, 04 Aug 1998 23:40:08 -0700
  • Re: SMBFS: Question... Tue, 04 Aug 1998 17:58:08 -0700
• bytor@tucka.nmhu.edu
  • How to crash the linux console (framebuffer, that is) Mon, 3 Aug 1998 21:34:16 -0400 (EDT)
• C. Scott Ananian
  • Re: kernel compile time comparison (2.0 vs 2.1 with 64MB) Mon, 3 Aug 1998 06:42:54 -0400 (EDT)
• Camm Maguire
  • 2.0.34 error: Freelist block not free Mon, 3 Aug 1998 12:21:14 -0400 (EDT)
• Carsten Gross
  • Re: Data corruption using 2940U Thu, 6 Aug 1998 11:39:00 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: Data corruption using 2940U Thu, 6 Aug 1998 00:10:37 +0200
  • Data corruption using 2940U Sun, 2 Aug 1998 22:32:14 +0200
• Carsten Pluntke
  • malloc()? vmalloc()? kmalloc()? Tue, 4 Aug 1998 08:05:40 +0200 (MET DST)
• Chad C Giffin
  • Re: MULTIPLE COPIES OF KERNEL DIGEST ... getting worse !!! Wed, 5 Aug 1998 17:22:43 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: MULTIPLE COPIES OF KERNEL DIGEST ... getting worse !!! Wed, 5 Aug 1998 17:45:21 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: no problems w/2.0.35/6x86L P166 (was Re: CyrixInstead ?) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 23:45:57 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: gcc 2.7.2.3 vs gcc 2.8.1 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 23:27:47 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: no problems w/2.0.35/6x86L P166 (was Re: CyrixInstead ?) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 23:45:57 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: gcc 2.7.2.3 vs gcc 2.8.1 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 23:27:47 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: no problems w/2.0.35/6x86L P166 (was Re: CyrixInstead ?) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 23:45:57 -0400 (EDT)
• Chad Gatesman
  • FollowUp: Problems booting 2.1.x kernels Mon, 03 Aug 1998 19:05:19 -0400
  • Problems booting 2.1.x kernels Mon, 3 Aug 1998 16:38:36 -0400
• Chip Salzenberg
  • Re: Stack Smashing and no-exec Fri, 7 Aug 1998 17:48:48 -0400
  • Re: [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Thu, 6 Aug 1998 18:49:16 -0400
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Thu, 6 Aug 1998 10:27:48 -0400
• Chng Tiak-Jung
  • Re: Mount in VCD-Format Mon, 03 Aug 1998 11:20:21 +0800
• Chris Adams
  • Re: Linux version 2.1.113 3 Aug 1998 15:30:18 -0500
• Chris Cheney
  • Duplicate linux-kernel-digest messages being sent Wed, 05 Aug 1998 08:32:08 -0500
• Chris Evans
  • Re: [2.1.113] What is CHECK_TTY_COUNT warning me about? Wed, 5 Aug 1998 21:12:17 +0100 (GMT)
• Chris Loveland
  • [PATCH] minor ext2 bug Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:02:37 -0400 (EDT)
• Chris Wedgwood
  • Re: More oops detail Fri, 7 Aug 1998 19:36:21 +1200
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 19:08:29 +1200
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 13:19:51 +1200
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 11:33:02 +1200
  • Re: Corruption Stats (fwd) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 11:15:01 +1200
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 19:47:54 +1200
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 19:54:39 +1200
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 18:21:33 +1200
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 18:07:03 +1200
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 18:07:03 +1200
  • Re: Lilo is not happening Tue, 4 Aug 1998 20:01:31 +1200
  • core dumps when uid has been changed since exec Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:06:23 +1200
  • Re: Looking for 4-way Xeon patches Tue, 4 Aug 1998 13:30:19 +1200
  • Re: SMBFS: Question... Mon, 3 Aug 1998 18:39:06 +1200
• Chris.Arguin@unh.edu
  • Re: RS-485 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 22:57:48 -0400 (EDT)
  • RS-485 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 18:15:26 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: tulip-driver update Mon, 3 Aug 1998 07:43:04 -0400 (EDT)
• chrisj
  • Compiling new kernel Wed, 5 Aug 1998 21:13:49 -0500
• Christer Weinigel
  • ESCD configuration 2 Aug 1998 01:04:48 -0000
• Christian Froemmel
  • tulip-driver update Mon, 3 Aug 1998 06:45:26 +0200 (MESZ)
• Christian Viken
  • Re: Linux 2.1.x IDE/ATAPI CDROM support Tue, 04 Aug 1998 10:44:29 +0200
• Christof Damian
  • Re: no fun with SMP & 2.1.114 Wed, 05 Aug 1998 17:02:10 +0100
  • single kernel tree ? was Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 05 Aug 1998 09:52:24 +0100
  • single kernel tree ? was Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 05 Aug 1998 09:52:24 +0100
  • no fun with SMP & 2.1.114 Tue, 04 Aug 1998 12:38:24 +0100
• Christophe Chapuis
  • it goes wrong... Wed, 5 Aug 1998 18:51:39 +0200 (MET DST)
• Christopher Eveland
  • Re: Problems with mmap Mon, 03 Aug 1998 16:41:33 +0000
• Colin Coe
  • Error compiling 2.1.113 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 20:02:33 +0800 (WST)
• Craig Schlenter
  • Re: Error compiling 2.1.113 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 14:42:32 +0200 (SAST)
• Damacus Porteng
  • Re: profile patch for 2.1.114 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 15:05:39 -0500 (CDT)
• Dan O'Neal
  • Hang Fri, 7 Aug 1998 01:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
• Daniel Egger
  • Re: 2.1.113 Mill I 8MB & scrollback :-( Fri, 7 Aug 1998 19:26:46 +0200
• Daniel Engstrom
  • Re: PCI in 112 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 19:48:53 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: IDE driver able to hot-swap? Sun, 2 Aug 1998 13:31:09 +0200 (CEST)
• Daniel Pittman
  • Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Mon, 03 Aug 1998 16:10:31 +0200
• Daniel Thom
  • 2.1.115 Panic Shortly After Boot (Interrupt related???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 14:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
• Dave Airlie
  • Re: patch for 2.1.115 wabi problem Sat, 8 Aug 1998 19:07:40 +0100 (IST)
  • Re: output of ksymoops for wabi bug ... Sat, 8 Aug 1998 16:01:24 +0100 (IST)
  • output of ksymoops for wabi bug ... Fri, 7 Aug 1998 14:21:53 +0100 (IST)
  • caldera WABI under 2.1 Thu, 6 Aug 1998 12:28:49 +0100 (IST)
• Dave Cinege
  • Re: SCSI tape driver Sat, 08 Aug 1998 09:53:18 -0400
  • Re: SCSI tape driver Fri, 07 Aug 1998 14:37:36 -0400
  • Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Tue, 04 Aug 1998 10:41:29 -0400
• david
  • Re: [2.1.113] What is CHECK_TTY_COUNT warning me about? Thu, 6 Aug 1998 18:53:58 -0700
• David Bruce
  • LDT problems with 2.1.109 and above. Wed, 12 Aug 1998 21:35:47
• David Burrows
  • Re: DEVFS and permissions/group/owner Sat, 8 Aug 1998 10:54:15 +1000 (EST)
  • Re: non exec stack & devfs threads! Fri, 7 Aug 1998 00:14:52 +1000 (EST)
  • Re: non exec stack & devfs threads! Fri, 7 Aug 1998 00:16:35 +1000 (EST)
  • non exec stack & devfs threads! Thu, 6 Aug 1998 12:10:58 +1000 (EST)
  • Re: How to crash the linux console (framebuffer, that is) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:40:39 +1000 (EST)
  • Re: SMBFS: Question... Mon, 3 Aug 1998 16:57:02 +1000 (EST)
• David Hill
  • Support for Creative Ensoniq 97 sound card. Thu, 06 Aug 1998 21:32:27 -0400
  • Hi everyone! Thu, 06 Aug 1998 20:51:09 -0400
• David Howells
  • small NFS problem Mon, 03 Aug 1998 08:53:20 BST
• David Lang
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 18:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
• David Lawyer
  • Does linux support 8-sector floppies? Sat, 1 Aug 1998 21:31:20 -0700
• David Luyer
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 05 Aug 1998 15:07:48 +0800
• david parsons
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) 7 Aug 1998 16:05:25 -0700
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) 5 Aug 1998 11:30:25 -0700
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) 4 Aug 1998 20:10:31 -0700
• David S. Miller
  • Re: Idea to make a kickass TCP read! Fri, 7 Aug 1998 05:28:16 -0700
  • Re: 2.1.115 compile error on Sparc arch Thu, 6 Aug 1998 16:02:28 -0700
  • Re: 2.1.115-4 and SPARC64 Thu, 6 Aug 1998 00:00:22 -0700
  • duplicate test Wed, 5 Aug 1998 16:35:14 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 00:05:52 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 20:51:51 -0700
  • Re: MULTIPLE COPIES OF KERNEL DIGEST ... getting worse !!! Tue, 4 Aug 1998 20:50:12 -0700
  • Re: MULTIPLE COPIES OF KERNEL DIGEST ... getting worse !!! Tue, 4 Aug 1998 20:50:12 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 20:51:51 -0700
  • Re: pre-2.1.115-2 fails compile pgtable_cache_water Tue, 4 Aug 1998 18:54:52 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 18:36:41 -0700
  • Re: Security Patches (was Re: [PATCH].. blah) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:49:55 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 15:23:21 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:45:49 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:17:08 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:01:02 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 13:35:25 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 13:07:00 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 12:48:24 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 11:57:48 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 11:37:56 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 11:01:35 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 09:47:05 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 09:53:29 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 09:13:36 -0700
  • Re: 2.1.114 fails build on i386 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 17:31:39 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Mon, 3 Aug 1998 09:23:55 -0700
  • Re: struct ucred change in 2.1.113 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 04:45:17 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix to make check_pgt_cache work on !i386 architectures Mon, 3 Aug 1998 04:41:34 -0700
• David Woodhouse
  • (no subject) Sat, 08 Aug 1998 15:34:26 +0100
  • Re: Sending 256 bytes synchronously from 16550A w/ Linux or RT-Linux Thu, 06 Aug 1998 17:52:12 +0100
• David Wragg
  • Compiler alternatives to no-exec (was Re: non exec stack...) 07 Aug 1998 00:49:20 +0000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) 06 Aug 1998 03:12:06 +0000
  • Re: FB and MTRR 04 Aug 1998 18:27:38 +0000
  • Re: Looking for 4-way Xeon patches 04 Aug 1998 00:18:52 +0000
  • Re: mtrr 03 Aug 1998 19:27:52 +0000
  • Re: FB and MTRR 03 Aug 1998 19:25:59 +0000
• Dean Gaudet
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 16:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 18:21:47 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 11:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Races in open(2) Mon, 3 Aug 1998 13:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Races in open(2) Mon, 3 Aug 1998 10:50:02 -0700 (PDT)
• Derrick J Brashear
  • Re: 2.0 scsi BLIST_SINGLELUN and MBR-7 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 02:10:24 -0400 (EDT)
• dgaudet-list-linux-kernel@arctic.org
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 15:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
• Dieter =?ISO-8859-1?Q?N=FCtzel
  • Re: 2.1.113 Mill I 8MB & scrollback :-( Fri, 07 Aug 1998 17:10:28 +0200
  • 2.1.113 Mill I 8MB & scrollback :-( Wed, 05 Aug 1998 20:36:45 +0200
• Dominik Weis
  • Re: pseudo-tty problems w/2.1.115 Sat, 8 Aug 1998 15:00:40 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: pseudo-tty problems w/2.1.115 Sat, 8 Aug 1998 11:22:38 -0400 (EDT)
  • NCR53c895 Wed, 5 Aug 1998 21:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
• Doug Ledford
  • Re: Data corruption using 2940U Mon, 03 Aug 1998 15:06:33 -0500
• Dustin Marquess
  • [OFFTOPIC] IP Tunneling Mon, 3 Aug 1998 02:17:53 -0500 (CDT)
• Eastep, Tom
  • RE: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 19:52:19 -0500
• Edgar Toernig
  • [PATCH] 2.0.35 scsi.c single_lun flag Fri, 07 Aug 1998 02:42:53 +0200
  • Re: Scsi cd changer question Sun, 02 Aug 1998 04:08:57 +0200
• Edward S. Marshall
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 00:45:43 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 20:38:16 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Mon, 3 Aug 1998 23:01:32 -0500 (CDT)
• Eloy A. Paris
  • PCI: Discovered primary peer bus xx (how I was able to boot) Mon, 3 Aug 1998 10:18:51 -0400 (VET)
• Emmanuel Galanos
  • 2.1.113 oops in schedule Sun, 2 Aug 1998 21:53:06 +1000 (EST)
• Eric A. Stephens
  • Re: 2.1.113: still an SMP related oops at boot time Mon, 03 Aug 1998 15:40:48 -0400
• Eric McDonald
  • Re: devfs Fri, 7 Aug 1998 23:47:39 -0400 (EDT)
• Eric W Biederman
  • Re: writable swap cache explained (it's weird) Sat, 1 Aug 1998 23:54:03 -0500 (CDT)
• Erik Andersen
  • mounting multiple slots in CD changers Fri, 7 Aug 1998 09:04:00 -0600 (MDT)
  • DEVFS and permissions/group/owner Fri, 7 Aug 1998 08:51:14 -0600 (MDT)
  • Re: video4linux, Hauppauge: no sound Tue, 4 Aug 1998 09:55:10 -0600 (MDT)
  • Re: ONE PATCH TO COMPILE 2.1.114 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 23:56:00 -0600
  • Re: 2.1.114 fails build on i386 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 21:34:58 -0600
  • Re: Linux 2.1.x IDE/ATAPI CDROM support Mon, 3 Aug 1998 18:50:37 -0600
• Erik Corry
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 21:00:52 +0200
• Etienne Lorrain
  • Re: gcc 2.7.1 Fri, 7 Aug 1998 11:47:07 +0001
  • gcc 2.7.1 Wed, 5 Aug 1998 14:41:52 +0001
• Eugene Crosser
  • Re: 2.1.113: still an SMP related oops at boot time 2 Aug 1998 16:07:04 GMT
• Eyal Lebedinsky
  • Re: LILO in a mixed IDE/SCSI system Mon, 03 Aug 1998 22:48:38 +0000
• Felix von Leitner
  • 2.1.114 x86 compile problem Wed, 5 Aug 1998 11:20:23 +0200
  • video4linux, Hauppauge: no sound Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:04:40 +0200
• ff
  • char-major-4 and 2.1.115 Fri, 7 Aug 1998 12:38:20 -0400 (EDT)
• Florian Weimer
  • 2.1.109: Watchpoints persisting after debugger exits? 08 Aug 1998 13:11:47 +0200
• Francois-Rene Rideau
  • Re: Static analysis of the Linux kernel 03 Aug 1998 01:37:01 +0200
  • Static analysis of the Linux kernel 01 Aug 1998 19:16:29 +0200
• Frank DENIS -Jedi/Sector One-
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] duplicate Thu, 6 Aug 1998 09:01:39 +0200
• Gabriel Paubert
  • Re: [2.1.113] What is CHECK_TTY_COUNT warning me about? Fri, 7 Aug 1998 12:24:16 +0200 (METDST)
  • Re: [2.1.113] What is CHECK_TTY_COUNT warning me about? Thu, 6 Aug 1998 20:17:45 +0200 (METDST)
  • Re: [2.1.113] What is CHECK_TTY_COUNT warning me about? Thu, 6 Aug 1998 13:26:13 +0200 (METDST)
• Gadi Oxman
  • Re: !!Warning!! UDMA and Fujitsu HD Mon, 3 Aug 1998 20:49:11 +0400 (IDT)
  • Re: !!Warning!! UDMA and Fujitsu HD Mon, 3 Aug 1998 20:09:11 +0400 (IDT)
• Garst R. Reese
  • [OFFTOPIC]linux + WIN98 Sat, 08 Aug 1998 03:30:55 -0300
  • multiple copies of lkd Wed, 05 Aug 1998 00:47:26 -0300
• Gary Anderson
  • Re: MULTIPLE COPIES OF KERNEL DIGEST ... getting worse !!! Wed, 5 Aug 1998 08:48:08 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: MULTIPLE COPIES OF KERNEL DIGEST ... getting worse !!! Tue, 4 Aug 1998 22:38:34 -0400 (EDT)
  • MULTIPLE COPIES OF KERNEL DIGEST :( Tue, 4 Aug 1998 18:54:05 -0400 (EDT)
• Gary L. Hennigan
  • Re: SCSI tape driver 08 Aug 1998 08:55:06 -0600
• Geert Uytterhoeven
  • Are we being Intel-centric again? (Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or Fri, 7 Aug 1998 11:44:09 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [2.1.113] What is CHECK_TTY_COUNT warning me about? Fri, 7 Aug 1998 10:25:24 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: 2.1.113 Mill I 8MB & scrollback :-( Thu, 6 Aug 1998 16:39:26 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: what is a .pax file ? Thu, 6 Aug 1998 14:59:50 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Thu, 6 Aug 1998 12:27:05 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Thu, 6 Aug 1998 10:36:59 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: 2.1.113 Mill I 8MB & scrollback :-( Wed, 5 Aug 1998 23:29:16 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: IDE drive data transfer rates, kernel optimization? Wed, 5 Aug 1998 21:58:48 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: FB and MTRR Wed, 5 Aug 1998 15:05:07 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: FB and MTRR Wed, 5 Aug 1998 13:49:59 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: unresolve fb_display II Wed, 5 Aug 1998 10:09:39 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 09:41:38 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 00:07:27 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 22:26:34 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 13:38:43 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: FB and MTRR Sun, 2 Aug 1998 23:32:11 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: S3trio framebuffer on Intel? Sun, 2 Aug 1998 20:45:08 +0200 (CEST)
• Gerd Knorr
  • [patch #2] vesafb: panning and palette changes using bios Sat, 8 Aug 1998 11:56:28 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Matrox BIOS upgrades (Was Re: [patch] vesafb panning: scrollback support and nice speedup) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 10:19:37 +0200
  • Re: [patch] vesafb panning: scrollback support and nice speedup Fri, 7 Aug 1998 21:31:02 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] vesafb panning: scrollback support and nice speedup Fri, 7 Aug 1998 21:34:42 +0200 (CEST)
  • xntpd GPF Fri, 7 Aug 1998 22:15:38 +0200 (CEST)
  • [patch] vesafb panning: scrollback support and nice speedup Fri, 7 Aug 1998 00:08:36 +0200 (MEST)
  • Re: video4linux problem (was problem compiling 2.1.109/112) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 20:15:54 +0200
  • Re: video4linux, Hauppauge: no sound Tue, 4 Aug 1998 20:23:12 +0200
  • Re: FB and MTRR Tue, 4 Aug 1998 08:29:25 +0200
  • Re: FB and MTRR Mon, 3 Aug 1998 21:07:31 +0200
  • Re: FB and MTRR Mon, 3 Aug 1998 08:21:49 +0200
• Gestor de Sistemes
  • Re: [2.1.113] What is CHECK_TTY_COUNT warning me about? Fri, 7 Aug 1998 13:38:49 +0200 (CEST)
• Gordon Chaffee
  • VFAT patch (Re: 2.1.114: VFAT corrupts first block of a file) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 03:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: 2.1.115: ptys broken Sat, 8 Aug 1998 00:46:35 -0700 (PDT)
• Graeme Gregory
  • Framebuffer and X Thu, 6 Aug 1998 10:05:33 +0100
  • RE: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 09:27:20 +0100
• Greaves Tristan TM
  • Delaying ethernet initialization on reboot problem Wed, 5 Aug 1998 19:17:27 +0100
• Guest
  • interrupt latency Fri, 7 Aug 1998 21:06:12 +0200
• Guest section DW
  • Re: char-major-4 and 2.1.115 Sat, 8 Aug 1998 12:11:24 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: SMBFS: Question... Wed, 5 Aug 1998 13:36:58 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: v2.1.113: loop device oddities Wed, 5 Aug 1998 13:21:52 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: LILO in a mixed IDE/SCSI system Wed, 5 Aug 1998 13:08:27 +0200 (MET DST)
• H. Peter Anvin
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) 8 Aug 1998 08:37:10 GMT
  • Re: devfs: The conclusion. 8 Aug 1998 08:41:22 GMT
  • Read this if you have PTY problems in 2.1.115 Sat, 8 Aug 1998 01:35:14 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: devfs 8 Aug 1998 03:51:31 GMT
  • Re: Stack Smashing and no-exec Fri, 7 Aug 1998 18:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
  • Read this if you have PTY problems in 2.1.115 8 Aug 1998 03:45:50 GMT
  • Re: pty problems in 2.1.115 7 Aug 1998 22:51:47 GMT
  • Re: char-major-4 and 2.1.115 7 Aug 1998 22:33:57 GMT
  • Re: pseudo-tty problems w/2.1.115 8 Aug 1998 02:06:37 GMT
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 15:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: OFFTOPIC? PTY related question in 2.1.115 7 Aug 1998 20:22:49 GMT
  • Re: Stack Smashing and no-exec 7 Aug 1998 10:07:33 GMT
  • Re: [Fwd: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds] 7 Aug 1998 10:05:16 GMT
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) 7 Aug 1998 04:24:02 GMT
  • Re: Idea to make a kickass TCP read! 7 Aug 1998 01:24:32 GMT
  • Re: IDE-DRIVER Suggested Update 7 Aug 1998 00:09:19 GMT
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) 6 Aug 1998 23:23:38 GMT
  • Re: 2.1.115-4 and SPARC64 6 Aug 1998 19:50:08 GMT
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) 6 Aug 1998 09:52:44 GMT
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Thu, 6 Aug 1998 01:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) 6 Aug 1998 08:38:30 GMT
  • Latest device list; Unix98 PTY patch 6 Aug 1998 04:58:48 GMT
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Wed, 5 Aug 1998 18:36:48 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 5 Aug 1998 21:13:58 GMT
  • Re: SMBFS: Question... Wed, 5 Aug 1998 13:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: SMBFS: Question... 5 Aug 1998 08:06:47 GMT
  • Re: mount-2.8a 4 Aug 1998 20:18:39 GMT
  • Re: Console fixes for 2.1.113 4 Aug 1998 20:11:38 GMT
  • Re: VESA FB & PIO_FONTX 3 Aug 1998 19:50:08 GMT
  • Re: Idea: audio_cd_fs . 2 Aug 1998 03:47:22 GMT
  • Re: GSM short message from DAVE.SMS@MVHI.COM 2 Aug 1998 01:39:51 GMT
  • Re: Layout/Setup of Kernel 1 Aug 1998 21:14:12 GMT
• H.J. Lu
  • A nfsd patch Thu, 6 Aug 1998 21:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
  • A nfs client bug? Thu, 6 Aug 1998 07:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: NFS problem Tue, 4 Aug 1998 12:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: NFS problem Sun, 2 Aug 1998 10:39:45 -0700 (PDT)
  • A 64 bit patch Sat, 1 Aug 1998 15:58:59 -0700 (PDT)
  • NFS problem Sat, 1 Aug 1998 14:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
• Hans Reiser
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 07 Aug 1998 15:25:45 -0700
• Harp_Jason/raytheon@openmail.hcsd.hac.ca
  • Re: 10 of 12 IDE-Devices :: Believe IT or NOT Fri, 7 Aug 1998 09:14:23 -0700
• Harry Brueckner
  • Temperature Tue, 4 Aug 1998 23:59:32 +0200 (MET DST)
  • (no subject) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:33:01 +0200 (MET DST)
• heejin@looksmart.com
  • Q> Way to revise the kernel Mon, 03 Aug 1998 20:42:34 +0900
• Heikki Hannikainen
  • 2.1.114 lockup on boot, different one Tue, 4 Aug 1998 12:27:25 +0300 (EEST)
• Heinz Mauelshagen
  • LILO in a mixed IDE/SCSI system Mon, 03 Aug 1998 13:13:24 METDST
  • 2.1.112 - lock after large e2fsck while going multiuser Sun, 02 Aug 1998 17:04:47 METDST
• Hendrik Visage
  • DEVFS & Standard kernel. (WasRe: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)) Thu, 06 Aug 1998 11:11:55 +0200
• Henner Eisen
  • Re: socket destroy delayed 05 Aug 1998 00:06:30 +0200
• Henning P. Schmiedehausen
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds 5 Aug 1998 12:05:39 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds 5 Aug 1998 12:05:39 +0200
• Henrik Olsen
  • Re: gcc 2.7.1 Thu, 6 Aug 1998 03:34:54 +0000 ( )
• Herve REY
  • newbie question Fri, 7 Aug 1998 09:44:40 +0200 (DFT)
  • Re: Compiling new kernel Thu, 6 Aug 1998 11:22:06 +0200 (DFT)
  • what is a .pax file ? Thu, 6 Aug 1998 09:06:44 +0200 (DFT)
  • newbie in hacking linux kernel Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:50:26 +0200 (DFT)
  • compiling error Mon, 3 Aug 1998 17:03:02 +0200 (DFT)
• Horst von Brand
  • Re: gcc 2.7.1 Thu, 06 Aug 1998 08:17:42 -0400
  • Broken fix for gcc-2.7 breakage wrt empty structures in 2.1.115-4 Wed, 05 Aug 1998 20:27:23 -0500
  • 2.1.115-4 and SPARC64 Wed, 05 Aug 1998 20:34:22 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 05 Aug 1998 11:56:26 -0400
  • 2.1.114 on UP won't compile: Take 2 Tue, 04 Aug 1998 19:34:09 -0500
  • Re: 2.1.114 fails build on i386 Tue, 04 Aug 1998 16:58:23 -0400
  • Re: How to extend the task_struct? Tue, 04 Aug 1998 09:24:12 -0400
  • Re: 2.1.114 fails build on i386 Tue, 04 Aug 1998 09:11:25 -0400
  • Re: 2.1.114 linux/include/linux/sched.h problem - followup Tue, 04 Aug 1998 09:08:00 -0400
  • Re: 2.1.114 fails build on i386 Mon, 03 Aug 1998 22:37:24 -0500
  • 2.1.114 won't compile on i586 UP Mon, 03 Aug 1998 21:37:12 -0500
  • Re: Layout/Setup of Kernel Fri, 31 Jul 1998 23:54:49 -0500
• Ian Collier
  • VBE 2.0 (was Re: FB and MTRR) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 12:54:24 +0100 (BST)
• Ian Stirling
  • Hardware usage. Wed, 5 Aug 1998 15:23:59 +0100 (BST)
• Inaky Perez Gonzalez
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 17:25:24 +0200
  • [SUMMARY] How to get aligned memory Mon, 3 Aug 1998 18:03:53 +0200
• Ioannis Mavroukakis
  • Re: 2.1.113 fault.c:105: `local_bh_count' undeclared Mon, 3 Aug 1998 17:09:34 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Error compiling 2.1.113 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 17:08:49 +0100 (BST)
• Ion Badulescu
  • Re: problem with 114 sched.* changes (not the gcc one) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 03:22:34 -0400
  • Re: problem with 114 sched.* changes (not the gcc one) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 03:15:13 -0400
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 07:41:38 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Patch for faster interrupt handling. Tue, 4 Aug 1998 20:11:20 -0400
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 19:23:15 -0400
  • Re: small NFS problem Tue, 4 Aug 1998 10:20:34 -0400
  • Re: 2.0.36pre2 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 02:52:39 -0400
  • Re: Strange 2.0.35 Oops Sun, 2 Aug 1998 04:47:40 -0400
• Itai Nahshon
  • Gdb compile on kernels >= 2.1.113 (patch) Sat, 08 Aug 1998 16:01:03 +0300
• Jaime E. Gomez
  • !!Warning!! UDMA and Fujitsu HD Mon, 03 Aug 1998 03:11:53 -0500
• Jakob Borg
  • Re: Irritating ext2fs corruption [solved] Wed, 5 Aug 1998 16:24:29 +0200
  • Re: Irritating ext2fs corruption Tue, 4 Aug 1998 02:10:19 +0200
  • 2.1.114 fails build on i386 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 02:00:59 +0200
  • Re: Irritating ext2fs corruption Mon, 3 Aug 1998 02:56:54 +0200
  • Re: Irritating ext2fs corruption Sun, 2 Aug 1998 16:08:58 +0200
• Jakub Jelinek
  • [PATCH] fix for xconfig Thu, 6 Aug 1998 12:50:05 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Thu, 6 Aug 1998 10:38:06 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: [2.1.113] No-console config still won't build Wed, 5 Aug 1998 19:19:34 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 11:39:58 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 11:39:58 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 13:21:26 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: How to extend the task_struct? Tue, 4 Aug 1998 13:16:07 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix to make check_pgt_cache work on !i386 architectures Mon, 3 Aug 1998 13:36:29 +0200 (MET DST)
• James H. Cloos Jr.
  • Re: Linux version 2.1.113 03 Aug 1998 18:36:44 -0500
  • Re: Linux version 2.1.113 03 Aug 1998 13:00:13 -0500
  • Re: IDE driver able to hot-swap? 02 Aug 1998 08:59:16 -0500
• James M. J. Cassidy
  • Bug: PCI discovered primary peer bus Fri, 7 Aug 1998 10:58:03 -0400 (EDT)
  • 2.1.114 -- System Reboots Mon, 3 Aug 1998 21:15:50 -0400 (EDT)
• Jamie Lokier
  • Re: !!Warning!! UDMA and Fujitsu HD Tue, 4 Aug 1998 13:25:24 +0100
  • Re: !!Warning!! UDMA and Fujitsu HD Tue, 4 Aug 1998 00:20:43 +0100
• Jan Kneschke
  • unresolve fb_display II Wed, 5 Aug 1998 01:27:18 +0200 (MEST)
• Jan Niehusmann
  • Re: Irritating ext2fs corruption Tue, 4 Aug 1998 12:59:12 +0200
• Jan Rekorajski
  • [PATCH] GUS module not unloading Sat, 8 Aug 1998 02:04:33 +0200
• Jason Wilcox
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] duplicates? Wed, 05 Aug 1998 14:54:23 -0700
• Jauder Ho
  • Re: mount-2.8a Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
• Jean Meloche
  • help with ioremap needed Tue, 04 Aug 1998 19:54:06 -0700
  • help with ioremap needed Tue, 04 Aug 1998 19:54:06 -0700
  • ppp with 2.1.109 and 2.1.114 Tue, 04 Aug 1998 09:44:06 -0800
• Jean Wolter
  • 2.1.112: page fault from irq handler 07 Aug 1998 11:44:11 +0200
• Jeff Garzik
  • Re: devfs Sat, 08 Aug 1998 14:08:24 -0400
  • Re: devfs Sat, 08 Aug 1998 13:56:59 -0400
  • Re: devfs Fri, 7 Aug 1998 14:24:11 -0400 (EDT)
  • devfs Thu, 6 Aug 1998 14:28:52 -0400 (EDT)
  • cooked and raw files (was: Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 14:03:55 -0400 (EDT)
• Jeff Lightfoot
  • mystery memleak 2.0.x/2.1.11x 8 Aug 1998 01:08:58 +0900
  • Re: es1370 broken as non-module 3 Aug 1998 10:54:24 +0900
• Jeff Noxon
  • Re: 2.1.113 Mill I 8MB & scrollback :-( Thu, 6 Aug 1998 09:30:40 -0500
• jeffml@pobox.com
  • mystery memleak 2.0.x/2.1.11x Sat, 8 Aug 1998 07:37:19 +0900
• Jeffrey Hundstad
  • linux-2.1.115 -- no available ptys Fri, 7 Aug 1998 13:37:42 -0500 (CDT)
• Jeremy Domingue
  • TCP/IP Routing by user id? Tue, 4 Aug 1998 08:08:12 -0700
• Jeremy Katz
  • Problem compiling 2.1.114 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 17:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
• Jes Sorensen
  • Re: 2.1.112: page fault from irq handler 07 Aug 1998 17:59:21 +0200
  • Re: S3trio framebuffer on Intel? 03 Aug 1998 10:58:56 +0200
• Jiann-Ming Su
  • sx164 floppy solution (fwd) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 16:31:38 -0500 (CDT)
• Jim Wilcoxson
  • Off-topic: Free books for kernel hackers Thu, 06 Aug 1998 00:57:06 -0400
• jmerliot@easynet.fr
  • RE: Kernels 2.1.11[0-5] not booting... Sat, 08 Aug 1998 02:13:13 +0200 (CEST)
• Jochen Heuer
  • Re: devfs debate Thu, 6 Aug 1998 00:31:29 +0200
• Joel Jaeggli
  • Re: IDE drive data transfer rates, kernel optimization? Wed, 5 Aug 1998 14:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
• Johan Karlberg
  • Re: linux-kernel-digest V1 #2332 Wed, 5 Aug 1998 14:32:39 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: linux-kernel-digest V1 #2332 Wed, 5 Aug 1998 14:32:39 +0200 (CEST)
• John Alvord
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 09:39:37 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 16:18:31 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 10:50:14 -0400 (EDT)
• John Caldwell
  • Re: 2.0.35+Jumbo9 cpuid still broken for me... (brain oops) Mon, 3 Aug 1998 23:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
  • 2.0.35+Jumbo9 cpuid still broken for me... Mon, 3 Aug 1998 22:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
• John Fulmer
  • SMP code and uniprocessor Sun, 02 Aug 1998 16:15:41 -0500
• John G. Alvord
  • Re: Static analysis of the Linux kernel Mon, 03 Aug 1998 01:29:04 GMT
  • Re: Static analysis of the Linux kernel Sun, 02 Aug 1998 22:48:08 GMT
• John Hayward-Warburton
  • Re: [2.1.11[2-5]] Problems with vgacon and latin1 support. Sat, 8 Aug 1998 10:00:52 +0000 (GMT)
  • TCP blockage in 2.1.112? Sun, 2 Aug 1998 17:39:05 +0000 (GMT)
• John Summerfield
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 15:20:36 +0800 (WST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 10:13:17 +0800 (WST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 10:13:17 +0800 (WST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 10:13:17 +0800 (WST)
• Jon Evans
  • RE: Corruption Stats (fwd) Mon, 3 Aug 1998 09:27:23 +0100
• Jon Lewis
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Sat, 8 Aug 1998 02:37:07 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 15:42:54 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 13:36:42 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 12:35:31 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Mon, 3 Aug 1998 23:50:42 -0400 (EDT)
• Jon M. Taylor
  • Re: Stack Smashing and no-exec Sat, 8 Aug 1998 00:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Stack Smashing and no-exec Fri, 7 Aug 1998 23:50:47 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Stack Smashing and no-exec Fri, 7 Aug 1998 18:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: devfs Fri, 7 Aug 1998 19:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Stack Smashing and no-exec Fri, 7 Aug 1998 16:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Off-topic: Free books for kernel hackers Thu, 6 Aug 1998 12:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: S3trio framebuffer on Intel? Tue, 4 Aug 1998 15:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: S3trio framebuffer on Intel? Sun, 2 Aug 1998 13:47:09 -0700 (PDT)
• Jonathan Corbet
  • Kernel NFS and solaris machines Tue, 04 Aug 1998 16:41:09 -0600
• Joseph H. Buehler
  • Re: cooked and raw files (was: Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)) 07 Aug 1998 07:25:43 -0400
  • 2.0.3x kernel patch for alternate NFS servers (Re: mount-2.8a) 05 Aug 1998 21:29:14 -0400
  • Re: Static analysis of the Linux kernel 03 Aug 1998 08:24:55 -0400
  • Re: SMP code and uniprocessor 03 Aug 1998 08:19:02 -0400
• Joseph Malicki
  • Re: [Fwd: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds] Sat, 08 Aug 1998 01:18:45 -0400
  • [Fwd: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds] Thu, 06 Aug 1998 16:54:27 -0400
  • Foot-in-mouth: Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 Thu, 06 Aug 1998 17:37:15 -0400
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Thu, 06 Aug 1998 02:01:37 -0400
• Josh Cohen
  • Looking for 4-way Xeon patches Sun, 2 Aug 1998 22:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
• Jovanny Saravia
  • Permission denied for mount via nfs Thu, 6 Aug 1998 15:29:27 -0300
• Jurgen Botz
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 06 Aug 1998 09:12:26 -0700
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 06 Aug 1998 08:44:27 -0700
• Kalle Andersson
  • 2.1.115 success! Sat, 8 Aug 1998 17:30:58 +0200 (CEST)
• Karsten Petersen
  • Re: VBE 2.0 (was Re: FB and MTRR) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:34:27 +0200 (CEST)
• Keith Owens
  • Re: LILO in a mixed IDE/SCSI system Mon, 03 Aug 1998 21:30:29 +1000
  • Strange 2.0.35 Oops Sun, 02 Aug 1998 18:12:32 +1000
• Kenneth Albanowski
  • Re: Static analysis of the Linux kernel Sun, 2 Aug 1998 21:11:44 -0400 (EDT)
• Kevin Ivarson
  • Re: Idea: audio_cd_fs . Sat, 1 Aug 1998 23:15:11 -0500 (CDT)
• Kirk Bauer
  • When do you have to do a 'make dep ; make clean'? Fri, 7 Aug 1998 16:02:00 -0400 (EDT)
• Kit Cosper
  • 2.0.35 on Alpha - floppy strangeness Tue, 04 Aug 1998 17:24:30 -0300
• Kragen
  • Re: pseudo-tty problems w/2.1.115 Sat, 8 Aug 1998 14:28:09 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Stack Smashing and no-exec Sat, 8 Aug 1998 11:07:23 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Stack Smashing and no-exec Fri, 7 Aug 1998 21:16:35 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Stack Smashing and no-exec Fri, 7 Aug 1998 23:18:12 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 21:17:52 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Stack Smashing and no-exec Fri, 7 Aug 1998 18:27:37 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Compiler alternatives to no-exec (was Re: non exec stack...) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 14:20:06 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] modutils and UP/SMP modules_install Fri, 7 Aug 1998 13:10:40 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 11:40:38 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Antw: Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Fri, 7 Aug 1998 11:29:38 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Stack Smashing and no-exec Fri, 7 Aug 1998 11:44:14 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 11:22:28 -0400 (EDT)
  • 2.0 NR_FILES, NR_OPEN, NR_TASKS Fri, 7 Aug 1998 10:46:37 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Fri, 7 Aug 1998 10:29:18 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 10:25:52 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Unmask IRQ safe? Fri, 7 Aug 1998 10:10:35 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [Fwd: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds] Fri, 7 Aug 1998 09:59:17 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Compiler alternatives to no-exec (was Re: non exec stack...) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 10:34:09 -0400 (EDT)
• Kurt Garloff
  • Re: 6x86 recognition Thu, 6 Aug 1998 15:40:54 +0200
  • Re: 2.1.113 Mill I 8MB & scrollback :-( Thu, 6 Aug 1998 00:32:56 +0200
  • 6x86 recognition Thu, 6 Aug 1998 01:14:02 +0200
  • Re: HOWTO-vesafb v0.3 out! Sat, 1 Aug 1998 12:41:58 +0200
• Kurt Huwig
  • GPF in 2.0.35 (4 times) Sat, 1 Aug 1998 23:18:24 +0200
• L. Adrian Griffis
  • Re: Layout/Setup of Kernel Sun, 02 Aug 1998 19:41:31 -0500
• Lauri Tischler
  • Equal SMP Fri, 07 Aug 1998 10:35:10 +0300
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 06 Aug 1998 08:53:31 +0300
• len weiss
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] duplicates? Wed, 05 Aug 1998 17:17:12 -0700
• Leonard N. Zubkoff
  • Re: Looking for 4-way Xeon patches Mon, 3 Aug 1998 18:13:50 -0700
  • Re: Looking for 4-way Xeon patches Mon, 3 Aug 1998 09:38:44 -0700
• Linus Torvalds
  • Re: 2.1.115: ptys broken 8 Aug 1998 18:31:11 GMT
  • Re: VFAT patch (Re: 2.1.114: VFAT corrupts first block of a file) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 10:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: 2.1.114 VFS code 5x slower than 2.0.33?!? 8 Aug 1998 02:12:06 GMT
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Fri, 7 Aug 1998 12:54:44 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Compiler alternatives to no-exec (was Re: non exec stack...) 7 Aug 1998 06:20:07 GMT
  • Re: Shared edge triggered interrupts Thu, 6 Aug 1998 17:13:43 -0700 (PDT)
  • Linux-2.1.115 - code freeze. Thu, 6 Aug 1998 14:17:40 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: gcc 2.7.1 Wed, 5 Aug 1998 10:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 20:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 20:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 20:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: 2.1.114 fails build on i386 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 15:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:35:14 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: profile patch for 2.1.114 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: 2.1.114 fails build on i386 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: 2.1.114 fails build on i386 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 12:47:23 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: profile patch for 2.1.114 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 11:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 11:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Patch for faster interrupt handling. Tue, 4 Aug 1998 10:50:47 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: 2.1.114 fails build on i386 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 10:39:49 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: 2.1.114 fails build on i386 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 10:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Patch for faster interrupt handling. Tue, 4 Aug 1998 00:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: 2.1.114 fails build on i386 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 23:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: page_alloc strange mask += mask Mon, 3 Aug 1998 10:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: 2.1.113 UP compilation problem Sat, 1 Aug 1998 18:36:00 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: 2.1.111: IDE DMA disabled? Sat, 1 Aug 1998 18:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
• Linux-Kernel Archives
  • Re: IPMasq under 2.1.113 Sun, 2 Aug 1998 20:02:10 -0500
  • IPMasq under 2.1.113 Sun, 2 Aug 1998 17:24:06 -0500
• LLORNKCOR
  • Re: multiple messages Wed, 5 Aug 1998 15:21:29 -0600
• llornkcor@llornkcor.com
  • RE: [OFFTOPIC] duplicates? Wed, 05 Aug 1998 17:40:10 -0600 (MDT)
• Lorenzo M. Catucci
  • Kernel 2.0.35 and 36pre2 not starting up Sat, 8 Aug 1998 12:32:15 +0200 (CEST)
• maciej h babinski
  • select with 0 timeout Thu, 6 Aug 1998 20:10:47 -0500
• Magnus & Tina
  • Re: Data corruption using 2940U Thu, 06 Aug 1998 17:54:19 +0100 (GMT+0100)
  • ext2 corruption?? Thu, 06 Aug 1998 17:54:13 +0100 (GMT+0100)
• Malcolm Beattie
  • Re: Idea to make a kickass TCP read Fri, 7 Aug 1998 10:00:31 +0100 (BST)
• Manuel J. Galan
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 05 Aug 1998 00:56:51 +0100 (WEST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 04 Aug 1998 19:56:36 +0100 (WEST)
  • Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Tue, 04 Aug 1998 19:49:19 +0100 (WEST)
  • Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Mon, 03 Aug 1998 13:53:53 +0100 (WEST)
  • RE: Newbie please help. I need a Boot-floopy with new AIC7xxxx ( Mon, 03 Aug 1998 00:30:01 +0100 (WEST)
• Marc Bechler
  • How to extend the task_struct? Tue, 4 Aug 1998 12:27:11 +0200
• Marc Heckman
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 13:24:07 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 13:49:36 -0400 (EDT)
• Marc SCHAEFER
  • Re: Corruption Stats (fwd) 6 Aug 1998 07:38:46 +0200
• marc.hansen@tg.fh-giessen.de
  • Mount in VCD-Format Sun, 02 Aug 1998 23:18:57 +0200 (CEST)
• Marcin Dalecki
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 11:54:49 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 11:54:49 -0700 (MST)
• Mark Lehrer
  • Signal 4 - what causes this? Thu, 6 Aug 1998 10:03:54 -0400
• Mark Lord
  • Re: 2.1.115: ptys broken Sat, 08 Aug 1998 13:56:20 -0400
  • 2.1.115: ptys broken Fri, 07 Aug 1998 17:19:44 -0400
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 06 Aug 1998 17:51:46 -0400
• Markus Kossmann
  • Re: Linux 2.1.115ac1 released Sat, 08 Aug 1998 15:11:41 +0200
• Marsh Ray
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 11:30:43 -0400
• Martin Mares
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 10:41:31 +0200
  • Re: Addendum to the console problems Wed, 5 Aug 1998 11:24:20 +0200
  • Re: Console fixes for 2.1.113 Wed, 5 Aug 1998 10:46:54 +0200
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 12:05:45 +0200
  • Re: FB and MTRR Wed, 5 Aug 1998 11:21:21 +0200
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 12:05:45 +0200
  • Re: 2.1.114 fails build on i386 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 20:24:45 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 20:05:35 +0200
  • PCI patch for 2.1.114 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 19:00:05 +0200
  • Console fixes for 2.1.113 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 16:27:44 +0200
  • Re: How to crash the linux console (framebuffer, that is) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 09:55:37 +0200
  • Re: Hmm, i have no bus on 2.1.113 ? :) Mon, 3 Aug 1998 19:43:14 +0200
  • Re: SORRY! VesaFB and scroling again Mon, 3 Aug 1998 18:57:15 +0200
  • Re: VESA FB & PIO_FONTX Mon, 3 Aug 1998 19:03:31 +0200
  • Re: Re[2]: Me too: "PCI: Discovered primary peer bus xx" Mon, 3 Aug 1998 19:40:01 +0200
  • Re: "2.1.10x NFS boot: Broken on Arcnet devices" Mon, 3 Aug 1998 14:43:32 +0200
  • Re: PCI in 112 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 12:16:47 +0200
  • Re: vgacon / vesafb performance stats Sun, 2 Aug 1998 16:56:40 +0200
  • Re: S3 High Speed text font support in vgacon.c [patch 2.1.112] Sun, 2 Aug 1998 17:20:53 +0200
  • Re: S3 High Speed text font support in vgacon.c [patch 2.1.112] Sun, 2 Aug 1998 17:13:33 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] vgacon vga_can_do_64kb Sun, 2 Aug 1998 16:39:33 +0200
  • Re: PCI in 112 Sun, 2 Aug 1998 15:49:56 +0200
  • Re: 2.1.112: Console funnies _almost_ cured Sun, 2 Aug 1998 16:35:45 +0200
  • Re: Me too: "PCI: Discovered primary peer bus xx" Sun, 2 Aug 1998 16:22:25 +0200
  • Re: AGP Sun, 2 Aug 1998 16:39:00 +0200
• Martin Schulze
  • Re: Strange 2.0.35 Oops Sun, 2 Aug 1998 10:21:30 +0200
• Marty Leisner
  • was 2.1.114 supposed to fix the pci bios problems? Wed, 5 Aug 1998 18:28:00 PDT
  • Re: lilo has problems on my machine... Wed, 5 Aug 1998 09:12:27 PDT
  • lilo has problems on my machine... Tue, 4 Aug 1998 20:33:39 PDT
  • lilo has problems on my machine... Tue, 4 Aug 1998 20:33:39 PDT
  • problems with 2.1.112 PCI Mon, 3 Aug 1998 09:25:42 PDT
• Matija Nalis
  • Re: Documentation on dcache (dentry) interface?, umsdos Mon, 3 Aug 98 23:52 MET DST
• Matthew D. Pitts
  • Re: gcc 2.7.2.3 vs gcc 2.8.1 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 21:50:21 -0400
  • Re: SMP code and uniprocessor Mon, 3 Aug 1998 15:16:53 -0400
• Matthew G. Marsh
  • Re: 2.1.114 lockup on boot, different one Tue, 4 Aug 1998 05:15:29 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Linux 2.1.113 SMP locking hard Sat, 1 Aug 1998 16:43:20 -0500 (CDT)
• Matthew Wilcox
  • Re: Bug in 2.1 loop block dev? Sat, 8 Aug 1998 00:28:50 +0100 (BST)
• Matti Aarnio
  • Re: MULTIPLE COPIES OF KERNEL DIGEST ... getting worse !!! Thu, 6 Aug 1998 00:12:11 +0300 (EEST)
  • Re: 2.1.112 - lock after large e2fsck while going multiuser Sun, 2 Aug 1998 19:52:33 +0300 (EEST)
• Max Inux
  • Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Mon, 3 Aug 1998 09:20:47 -0700 (PWT)
  • Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Mon, 3 Aug 1998 00:12:55 -0700 (PWT)
  • CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Sun, 2 Aug 1998 21:44:54 -0700 (PWT)
  • Re: Does linux support 8-sector floppies? Sat, 1 Aug 1998 23:39:53 -0700 (PWT)
• Maximilian Rixius
  • NFS: evil patch Mon, 03 Aug 1998 16:09:37 +0200
• Meelis Roos
  • Re: Shared edge triggered interrupts Fri, 7 Aug 1998 19:01:27 +0300
  • Re: IDE-DRIVER Suggested Update Fri, 7 Aug 1998 17:50:37 +0300 (EEST)
  • Re: IDE drive data transfer rates, kernel optimization? Fri, 7 Aug 1998 15:56:21 +0300 (EEST)
  • Re: problem with 114 sched.* changes (not the gcc one) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 17:26:15 +0300
  • Re: IDE drive data transfer rates, kernel optimization? Fri, 7 Aug 1998 11:52:50 +0300
  • Re: IDE-DRIVER Suggested Update Thu, 6 Aug 1998 16:56:43 +0300
  • Re: problem with 114 sched.* changes (not the gcc one) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 14:34:16 +0300
  • Re: non exec stack & devfs threads! Thu, 6 Aug 1998 12:53:40 +0300
  • Re: 6x86 recognition Thu, 6 Aug 1998 12:19:50 +0300
  • Re: IDE drive data transfer rates, kernel optimization? Wed, 5 Aug 1998 22:33:58 +0300
  • Re: ftp trouble 2.1.114 <> Cray-System Wed, 5 Aug 1998 18:21:22 +0300
  • Re: Patch for faster interrupt handling. Wed, 5 Aug 1998 11:23:58 +0300
  • Re: 2.1.114: VFAT corrupts first block of a file Wed, 5 Aug 1998 13:08:32 +0300
  • Re: 2.1.114: VFAT corrupts first block of a file Wed, 5 Aug 1998 13:08:32 +0300
  • Re: Patch for faster interrupt handling. Wed, 5 Aug 1998 11:23:58 +0300
  • problem with 114 sched.* changes (not the gcc one) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 23:56:56 +0300 (EEST)
  • Re: Patch for faster interrupt handling. Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:32:36 +0300
  • Re: Patch for faster interrupt handling. Tue, 4 Aug 1998 13:49:04 +0300
  • Re: Patch for faster interrupt handling. Tue, 4 Aug 1998 12:48:08 +0300
  • Re: tulip-driver update Mon, 3 Aug 1998 10:20:26 +0300
• Meino Christian Cramer
  • RE: char-major-4 and 2.1.115 Sat, 08 Aug 1998 05:15:35 -0000 (???)
  • OFFTOPIC? PTY related question in 2.1.115 Fri, 07 Aug 1998 18:41:24 -0000 (???)
  • OFFTOPIC? PTY related question in 2.1.115 Fri, 07 Aug 1998 16:29:06 -0000 (???)
  • v2.1.113: loop device oddities Sun, 02 Aug 1998 06:41:04 -0000 (???)
• Michael D. Ivey, RHCE
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Thu, 6 Aug 1998 17:12:41 -0400
• Michael Driscoll
  • More info, Network problems [PPP and IPMASQ] Sat, 8 Aug 1998 06:48:11 -0600
  • Network (PPP or Masq) problems in 2.1.111 to 2.1.115 Sat, 8 Aug 1998 06:37:13 -0600
• Michael Elizabeth Chastain
  • Re: Is Documentation/ioctl-numbers.txt still accurate? Fri, 7 Aug 1998 00:00:13 -0500
• Michael H. Warfield
  • Re: gcc 2.7.2.3 vs gcc 2.8.1 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 21:38:30 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: SMBFS: Question... Tue, 4 Aug 1998 21:22:48 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: 2.1.114 fails build on i386 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:39:38 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: 2.1.114 fails build on i386 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:28:00 -0400 (EDT)
  • 2.1.114 ouch - pci_direct_conf2 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 10:39:13 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: SMBFS: Question... Tue, 4 Aug 1998 08:52:03 -0400 (EDT)
  • 2.1.113 fault.c:105: `local_bh_count' undeclared Mon, 3 Aug 1998 11:04:45 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: SMBFS: Question... Mon, 3 Aug 1998 08:53:09 -0400 (EDT)
• Michael L. Galbraith
  • Re: 2.1.114 VFS code 5x slower than 2.0.33?!? Sat, 8 Aug 1998 13:33:52 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 15:30:49 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Stack Smashing and no-exec Sat, 8 Aug 1998 07:43:23 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: pty problems in 2.1.115 Fri, 7 Aug 1998 17:26:47 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 06:49:20 +0200 (MET DST)
• Michael Lang
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 23:18:52 +0200 (MET DST)
• Michael Lausch
  • Massive NFS client errors in 2.1.111 Thu, 06 Aug 1998 13:30:42 +0200
  • Massive NFS client errors in 2.1.111 Thu, 06 Aug 1998 13:30:42 +0200
• Michael Leodolter
  • 2.1.115pre3 SMP Success Wed, 05 Aug 1998 13:39:35 +0200
• Michael Nelson
  • Re: 2.1.114 fails build on i386 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 20:28:39 +0000 ( )
• Michael Poole
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) 06 Aug 1998 11:47:05 -0400
• Michael Riepe
  • Re: 2.1.114 fails build on i386 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 16:41:24 +0200
• Michael Shields
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) 07 Aug 1998 04:02:03 +0000
• Michel Catudal
  • Re: 2.1.114 VFS code 5x slower than 2.0.33?!? Fri, 07 Aug 1998 21:37:40 -0400
  • Re: No more connection to internet after Kernel 2.1.113 Fri, 07 Aug 1998 21:29:33 -0400
  • Re: No more connection to internet after Kernel 2.1.113 Fri, 07 Aug 1998 19:43:36 -0400
  • Re: 2.1.114 VFS code 5x slower than 2.0.33?!? Fri, 07 Aug 1998 13:02:45 -0400
  • Internet extremmely slow with kernel 2.1.114 Thu, 06 Aug 1998 12:57:08 -0400
  • Re: No more connection to internet after Kernel 2.1.113 Thu, 06 Aug 1998 15:27:48 -0700
  • Re: multiple messages Wed, 05 Aug 1998 21:49:42 -0400
  • Re: 2.1.X sound? Wed, 05 Aug 1998 09:11:42 -0700
  • Re: No more connection to internet after Kernel 2.1.113 Tue, 04 Aug 1998 22:43:57 -0400
  • Re: No more connection to internet after Kernel 2.1.113 Tue, 04 Aug 1998 12:37:18 -0400
  • Re: No more connection to internet after Kernel 2.1.113 Mon, 03 Aug 1998 21:56:46 -0400
  • Re: No more connection to internet after Kernel 2.1.113 Sun, 02 Aug 1998 18:09:50 -0400
  • No more connection to internet after Kernel 2.1.113 Sun, 02 Aug 1998 17:34:50 -0400
• Michel Eyckmans
  • 2.1.113: still an SMP related oops at boot time Sun, 02 Aug 1998 01:57:55 +0200
• Mikael Pettersson
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Thu, 6 Aug 1998 11:36:38 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 15:23:12 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:41:35 +0200 (MET DST)
  • floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 11:29:14 +0200 (MET DST)
• Mike
  • Re: SUID scripts? Thu, 6 Aug 98 17:23:38 -0700
• Mike A. Harris
  • Re: CAN WE PLEAZZZ STOP TALING ABOUT THE REDUNDANT STUFF Sat, 8 Aug 1998 09:29:06 -0400 (EDT)
  • Here is my procmail duplicate filter. Fri, 7 Aug 1998 10:26:22 -0400 (EDT)
  • Unmask IRQ safe? Thu, 6 Aug 1998 14:12:35 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: IDE drive data transfer rates, kernel optimization? Thu, 6 Aug 1998 12:53:34 -0400 (EDT)
  • Duplicate email on this list Thu, 6 Aug 1998 13:56:57 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: IDE drive data transfer rates, kernel optimization? Wed, 5 Aug 1998 17:05:42 -0400 (EDT)
  • IDE drive data transfer rates, kernel optimization? Wed, 5 Aug 1998 10:49:23 -0400 (EDT)
  • TX-PRO chipset (Was: !!Warning!! UDMA and Fujitsu HD) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 07:22:32 -0400 (EDT)
  • Plip timeout errors Mon, 3 Aug 1998 20:51:20 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: !!Warning!! UDMA and Fujitsu HD Mon, 3 Aug 1998 16:06:13 -0400 (EDT)
  • VERY STRANGE bug in 2.0.35 console display code Mon, 3 Aug 1998 15:38:09 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: SMP code and uniprocessor Mon, 3 Aug 1998 10:03:34 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Mon, 3 Aug 1998 04:06:28 -0400 (EDT)
  • NOATIME/NODIRATIME mount option Sun, 2 Aug 1998 03:16:23 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: IDE driver able to hot-swap? Sun, 2 Aug 1998 03:09:51 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: GSM short message from DAVE.SMS@MVHI.COM Sun, 2 Aug 1998 03:03:50 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: GSM short message from DAVE.SMS@MVHI.COM Sat, 1 Aug 1998 21:12:05 -0400 (EDT)
• Mike Jagdis
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 11:48:05 +0100 (GMT/BST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 16:21:35 +0100 (GMT/BST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 09:53:34 +0100 (GMT/BST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 09:53:34 +0100 (GMT/BST)
• Mike Sackton
  • Problem with parallel port sharing in 2.0.3x Mon, 3 Aug 1998 15:48:03 -0400 (EDT)
• Miquel van Smoorenburg
  • Re: [2.1.113] What is CHECK_TTY_COUNT warning me about? 7 Aug 1998 11:31:42 +0200
  • Re: [2.1.113] What is CHECK_TTY_COUNT warning me about? 7 Aug 1998 08:53:04 GMT
  • Re: IDE drive data transfer rates, kernel optimization? 6 Aug 1998 13:19:43 GMT
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) 5 Aug 1998 09:00:49 GMT
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) 5 Aug 1998 09:00:49 GMT
  • Re: Irritating ext2fs corruption 3 Aug 1998 20:02:49 GMT
• Mitch Adair
  • Re: devfs Fri, 7 Aug 1998 21:33:06 -0500 (CDT)
• Mitchell Blank Jr
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Thu, 6 Aug 1998 01:28:41 -0500
• MOLNAR Ingo
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 12:52:40 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 12:52:40 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: How to extend the task_struct? Tue, 4 Aug 1998 12:42:42 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: kernel compile time comparison (2.0 vs 2.1 with 64MB) Mon, 3 Aug 1998 18:47:11 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: kernel compile time comparison (2.0 vs 2.1 with 64MB) Mon, 3 Aug 1998 10:18:58 +0200 (CEST)
• Nathan Hand
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Sun, 9 Aug 1998 00:54:12 +1000 (EST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 20:04:17 +1000 (EST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 18:28:35 +1000 (EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Fri, 7 Aug 1998 18:11:26 +1000 (EST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 08:10:08 +1000 (EST)
• Nicolai P Guba
  • Re: no problems w/2.0.35/6x86L P166 (was Re: CyrixInstead ?) 03 Aug 1998 09:43:53 +0100
  • Re: CyrixInstead ? 03 Aug 1998 09:39:37 +0100
  • Re: CyrixInstead ? 02 Aug 1998 08:46:48 +0100
• Niels Kristian Bech Jensen
  • [2.1.11[2-5]] Problems with vgacon and latin1 support. Fri, 7 Aug 1998 20:43:25 +0200 (CEST)
• Nimrod Zimerman
  • Bugfix: A patch that fixes a minor loop device bug Fri, 7 Aug 1998 17:42:51 +0300
• Nix
  • Odd 2.0.35 swap-related errors Fri, 7 Aug 1998 21:43:20 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Irritating ext2fs corruption Sun, 2 Aug 1998 22:26:56 +0100 (BST)
• No One
  • CAN WE PLEAZZZ STOP TALING ABOUT THE REDUNDANT STUFF Wed, 5 Aug 1998 23:44:41 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: lilo has problems on my machine... Tue, 4 Aug 1998 21:33:22 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: lilo has problems on my machine... Tue, 4 Aug 1998 21:33:22 -0700 (MST)
• Noah Beck
  • Re: Shared edge triggered interrupts Fri, 07 Aug 1998 09:25:35 -0500
• Nomad the Wanderer
  • aha2940 still not seeing devices Sat, 1 Aug 1998 23:18:04 -0600
• Olaf Titz
  • Re: vesafb-HOWTO v0.6 released Sat, 08 Aug 1998 18:32:26 +0200
  • Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Tue, 04 Aug 1998 13:03:12 +0200
  • Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Tue, 04 Aug 1998 13:20:01 +0200
  • Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Tue, 04 Aug 1998 12:57:19 +0200
• Olivier Galibert
  • Re: Idea to make a kickass TCP read! Fri, 7 Aug 1998 21:15:50 +0200
  • Re: Shared edge triggered interrupts Fri, 7 Aug 1998 10:49:22 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 08:17:14 +0200
• Pal-Kristian Engstad
  • devfs: The conclusion. Fri, 07 Aug 1998 16:07:53 -0400
  • SMBFS date fix. Tue, 04 Aug 1998 16:20:33 -0400
  • Re: SMBFS: Question... Mon, 03 Aug 1998 13:25:16 -0400
  • Re: SMBFS: Question... Mon, 03 Aug 1998 11:29:46 -0400
• Paolo Losi
  • Re: kernel compile time comparison (2.0 vs 2.1 with 64MB) Tue, 04 Aug 1998 10:18:49 +0000
• Pascal A. Dupuis
  • Re: gcc 2.7.1 Thu, 6 Aug 1998 09:46:36 +0200 (CEST)
• Patrick Mau
  • How to configire more than one md device ? Mon, 3 Aug 1998 22:10:51 +0200 (CEST)
• Paul Duncan
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC]linux + WIN98 Sat, 8 Aug 1998 11:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] duplicates? Wed, 5 Aug 1998 00:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: no problems w/2.0.35/6x86L P166 (was Re: CyrixInstead ?) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 19:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
  • no problems w/2.0.35/6x86L P166 (was Re: CyrixInstead ?) Sun, 2 Aug 1998 12:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
• Paul Mackerras
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 10:30:21 +1000 (EST)
• Paul Rusty Russell
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Thu, 06 Aug 1998 10:27:36 +0930
• Paul Slootman
  • Re: 2.0.36pre2 Fri, 7 Aug 1998 11:39:52 +0200
• Paul Wouters
  • Re: TCPv4 bad checksums: solved Sat, 8 Aug 1998 01:24:52 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: video4linux, Hauppauge: no sound Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:40:38 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Hmm, i have no bus on 2.1.113 ? :) Mon, 3 Aug 1998 18:41:44 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Mon, 3 Aug 1998 18:35:35 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Mon, 3 Aug 1998 11:48:06 +0200 (MET DST)
  • bttv on 2.1.113, no sound (other sound works fine) Sun, 2 Aug 1998 01:32:29 +0200 (MET DST)
• peloy@ven.ra.rockwell.com
  • Re: PCI patch for 2.1.114 5 Aug 1998 00:58:05 GMT
  • Re: PCI patch for 2.1.114 5 Aug 1998 00:58:05 GMT
  • Re: 2.1.113 fails to compile 3 Aug 1998 17:38:01 GMT
• Perry Harrington
  • Re: Idea to make a kickass TCP read! Thu, 6 Aug 1998 23:39:57 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Foot-in-mouth: Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 Thu, 6 Aug 1998 20:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
  • Idea to make a kickass TCP read Thu, 6 Aug 1998 15:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
  • Idea to make a kickass TCP read! Thu, 6 Aug 1998 11:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 18:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 15:21:01 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 13:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 13:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
• Pete Clements
  • 2.1.115 no network pty's Fri, 7 Aug 1998 11:23:21 -0400 (EDT)
  • pre-2.1.115-2 fails compile pgtable_cache_water Tue, 4 Aug 1998 20:23:27 -0400 (EDT)
  • 2.1.114 fails compile -- pci_direct_conf2 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 21:32:11 -0400 (EDT)
• Pete Harlan
  • [2.0.35] Lost timer or fin packet in tcp_fin. Sat, 8 Aug 1998 13:28:59 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Stack Smashing and no-exec Fri, 7 Aug 1998 16:52:10 -0500 (CDT)
• Peter Enderborg
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 05 Aug 1998 00:01:57 +0200
• Peter J. Braam
  • loop.c Sun, 2 Aug 1998 22:19:32 -0400 (EDT)
• Peter Monta
  • Re: 10 of 12 IDE-Devices :: Believe IT or NOT Fri, 7 Aug 1998 03:40:17 -0700
• Peter T. Breuer
  • Re: Shared edge triggered interrupts Sat, 8 Aug 1998 19:36:02 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: Shared edge triggered interrupts Fri, 7 Aug 1998 12:06:15 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 19:54:44 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: devfs debate Wed, 5 Aug 1998 20:25:08 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 23:22:28 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: !!Warning!! UDMA and Fujitsu HD Tue, 4 Aug 1998 15:35:08 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 13:01:49 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: !!Warning!! UDMA and Fujitsu HD Tue, 4 Aug 1998 11:25:17 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: !!Warning!! UDMA and Fujitsu HD Mon, 3 Aug 1998 22:03:36 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: !!Warning!! UDMA and Fujitsu HD Mon, 3 Aug 1998 18:38:30 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: kernel compile time comparison (2.0 vs 2.1 with 64MB) Mon, 3 Aug 1998 12:05:54 +0200 (MET DST)
• Peter Waltenberg
  • knfsd Wed, 05 Aug 1998 12:20:08 +1000 (EST)
  • knfsd Wed, 05 Aug 1998 12:20:08 +1000 (EST)
  • 2.1.112/3 and smbmount Tue, 04 Aug 1998 13:10:40 +1000 (EST)
• Petr Vandrovec Ing. VTEI
  • Re: Matrox Mill/Myst Thu, 6 Aug 1998 18:42:46 MET-1
  • Matrox Mill/Myst Thu, 6 Aug 1998 13:04:58 MET-1
• Petri Kaukasoina
  • Re: error in pipe.c? Fri, 7 Aug 1998 09:13:49 +0300
• Philip Gladstone
  • Re: problem with a new block device Tue, 04 Aug 1998 14:33:54 -0400
• Phillip Ezolt
  • Alpha Performance Counters Try 2. Mon, 3 Aug 1998 10:16:38 -0400 (EDT)
• Prakash D
  • Re: malloc()? vmalloc()? kmalloc()? Tue, 4 Aug 1998 15:06:40 +0500 (GMT+0500)
  • Lilo is not happening Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:41:57 +0500 (GMT+0500)
• Prescott, Richard
  • problem with a new block device Tue, 04 Aug 1998 12:55:35 -0400
• Purcell, Ken - COE Tech. Coor.
  • FW: Notification: Inbound Mail Failure Tue, 4 Aug 1998 08:31:43 -0500
• QingLong
  • Commands queued exceeds queue depth Fri, 7 Aug 1998 19:16:09 -2300
• Rafael Reilova
  • Re: 6x86 recognition Sat, 8 Aug 1998 01:20:30 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: 6x86 recognition Thu, 6 Aug 1998 21:39:49 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 20:47:45 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: 6x86 recognition Thu, 6 Aug 1998 16:58:43 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: kernel compile time comparison (2.0 vs 2.1 with 64MB) Mon, 3 Aug 1998 13:16:50 -0400 (EDT)
  • Wrong Patch, Re: [PATCH] minor typo in setup.c (CPU vendor , capabilities) Mon, 3 Aug 1998 12:16:35 -0400 (EDT)
  • [PATCH] minor typo in setup.c (CPU vendor capabilities) Mon, 3 Aug 1998 00:08:58 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: CyrixInstead ? Sun, 2 Aug 1998 12:55:08 -0400 (EDT)
• Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 17:02:47 +0200 (MET DST)
  • 2.1.115 oops Fri, 7 Aug 1998 14:05:10 +0200 (MET DST)
  • [PATCH] modutils and UP/SMP modules_install Fri, 7 Aug 1998 13:32:43 +0200 (MET DST)
  • fileutils 3.16 Thu, 6 Aug 1998 21:26:36 +0200 (MET DST)
  • [PATCH] vgacon vga_can_do_64kb Sat, 1 Aug 1998 17:00:02 +0200 (MET DST)
• ralf@uni-koblenz.de
  • Re: Corruption Stats (fwd) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 18:25:26 +0200
  • Re: NFS problem Tue, 4 Aug 1998 18:23:15 +0200
• Raul Miller
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 17:45:58 -0400
  • Re: Security Patches (was Re: [PATCH].. blah) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 17:41:23 -0400
  • Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Mon, 3 Aug 1998 08:12:26 -0400
  • Re: Problem building 2.1.113 Sat, 1 Aug 1998 22:48:54 -0400
  • Problem building 2.1.113 Sat, 1 Aug 1998 21:39:34 -0400
• Ravi Kishore Terala
  • TXPRO-II (m571) mother board Wed, 05 Aug 1998 19:12:56 -0600
• Renaud Guerin
  • [2.1 SOUND] GUS DMA timeout Sun, 02 Aug 1998 22:27:11 +0200
• Rene Janssen
  • Re: Compiler alternatives to no-exec (was Re: non exec Fri, 07 Aug 1998 14:22:58 +0200
  • Re: [Fwd: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 Fri, 07 Aug 1998 09:35:01 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Thu, 06 Aug 1998 10:10:34 +0200
• Richard B. Johnson
  • Re: Compiler alternatives to no-exec (was Re: non exec stack...) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 09:37:46 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Shared edge triggered interrupts Fri, 7 Aug 1998 13:24:58 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Fri, 7 Aug 1998 09:43:19 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Large numbers of files. Fri, 7 Aug 1998 10:32:33 -0400 (EDT)
  • Large numbers of files. Thu, 6 Aug 1998 16:56:57 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Thu, 6 Aug 1998 10:29:31 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Thu, 6 Aug 1998 09:23:01 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Thu, 6 Aug 1998 08:49:39 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Wed, 5 Aug 1998 17:45:01 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Wed, 5 Aug 1998 14:31:27 -0400 (EDT)
  • <Off-topic> SPAM Wed, 5 Aug 1998 09:36:25 -0400 (EDT)
  • Linux media exposure Wed, 5 Aug 1998 10:32:26 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Wed, 5 Aug 1998 09:05:34 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 15:50:58 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 09:14:54 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Linux version 2.1.113 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 20:12:27 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Linux version 2.1.113 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 18:08:21 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Linux version 2.1.113 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 17:57:45 -0400 (EDT)
  • Linux version 2.1.113 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 09:51:29 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Problem building 2.1.113 Sat, 1 Aug 1998 22:21:11 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: GSM short message from DAVE.SMS@MVHI.COM Sat, 1 Aug 1998 22:05:58 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Irritating ext2fs corruption Sat, 1 Aug 1998 21:49:03 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: GSM short message from DAVE.SMS@MVHI.COM Sat, 1 Aug 1998 21:04:41 -0400 (EDT)
• Richard Gooch
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 21:35:28 +1000
  • Re: DEVFS and permissions/group/owner Sat, 8 Aug 1998 09:06:53 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 11:24:09 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 11:22:52 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 10:00:07 +1000
  • devfs patch v51 available Sat, 8 Aug 1998 00:23:34 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 21:39:32 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 21:27:25 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 19:15:04 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 17:18:12 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 13:53:14 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 13:25:56 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 14:06:45 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 10:19:37 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 09:44:01 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 09:39:08 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 09:35:38 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 10:52:05 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 10:56:14 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 23:07:34 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 23:04:52 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 21:24:54 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 18:31:52 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 16:49:50 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 12:05:15 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 11:19:46 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 11:55:29 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 11:08:53 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 10:43:19 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 09:56:25 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 10:20:12 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 09:35:16 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 01:08:11 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 00:12:57 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 00:23:29 +1000
  • Re: devfs-HOWTO ? Wed, 5 Aug 1998 21:59:19 +1000
  • Re: FB and MTRR Wed, 5 Aug 1998 21:54:23 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 20:23:59 +1000
  • Re: FB and MTRR Wed, 5 Aug 1998 20:31:19 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 20:21:38 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 18:05:38 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 18:17:27 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 16:51:26 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 20:23:59 +1000
  • Re: FB and MTRR Wed, 5 Aug 1998 20:31:19 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 20:21:38 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 20:21:38 +1000
  • Re: FB and MTRR Wed, 5 Aug 1998 14:38:05 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 13:58:24 +1000
  • Re: devfs compatibility Wed, 5 Aug 1998 14:23:17 +1000
  • Re: devfs compatibility Wed, 5 Aug 1998 14:23:17 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 13:58:24 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 13:58:24 +1000
  • Re: FB and MTRR Wed, 5 Aug 1998 14:38:05 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 13:58:24 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 11:45:09 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 11:28:56 +1000
  • Re: devfs compatibility Tue, 4 Aug 1998 19:17:34 +1000
  • Re: devfs compatibility Tue, 4 Aug 1998 18:11:15 +1000
  • Re: FB and MTRR Tue, 4 Aug 1998 16:45:33 +1000
  • Re: OOPS: 2.1.114 + devfs Tue, 4 Aug 1998 16:42:07 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 11:58:10 +1000
  • Re: FB and MTRR Tue, 4 Aug 1998 11:47:07 +1000
  • Re: FB and MTRR Tue, 4 Aug 1998 11:38:51 +1000
  • Re: mtrr Tue, 4 Aug 1998 11:40:44 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 11:23:55 +1000
  • Re: Races in open(2) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 10:11:45 +1000
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Mon, 3 Aug 1998 19:31:25 +1000
  • Re: mtrr Mon, 3 Aug 1998 11:25:00 +1000
  • Re: mtrr Mon, 3 Aug 1998 10:11:48 +1000
  • devfs patch v50 available Sun, 2 Aug 1998 10:21:59 +1000
• Richard Guenther
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 11:43:52 +0200 (METDST)
• Richard Thomas
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Sat, 8 Aug 1998 05:41:53 -0400
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Thu, 6 Aug 1998 06:15:49 -0400
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 09:39:08 -0400
• Rik van Riel
  • Re: radio freqs (was: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 20:38:13 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: S3trio framebuffer on Intel? Tue, 4 Aug 1998 19:37:34 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: S3trio framebuffer on Intel? Sun, 2 Aug 1998 21:33:17 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: NS resolver Sun, 2 Aug 1998 12:28:31 +0200 (CEST)
  • S3trio framebuffer on Intel? Sun, 2 Aug 1998 12:24:32 +0200 (CEST)
• Robert Hamilton
  • Re: some low-memory 2.1.109 compile times Mon, 20 Jul 1998 15:23:52 -0500
• robert@bga.com
  • pty problems in 2.1.115 Thu, 6 Aug 1998 21:57:15 -0500 (CDT)
• Roderich Schupp
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 13:02:32 +0200
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 22:45:38 +0200
• Roeland Th. Jansen
  • Re: [2.1 SOUND] GUS DMA timeout Sun, 2 Aug 1998 23:32:56 +0000 (GMT)
• Roger Espel Llima
  • Re: what is a .pax file? Thu, 6 Aug 1998 13:29:34 -0400
• Rogier Wolff
  • Re: Idea to make a kickass TCP read! Fri, 7 Aug 1998 12:04:01 +0200 (MEST)
  • Re: Large numbers of files. Fri, 7 Aug 1998 08:48:39 +0200 (MEST)
  • Re: IDE drive data transfer rates, kernel optimization? Thu, 6 Aug 1998 08:42:59 +0200 (MEST)
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Wed, 5 Aug 1998 23:38:01 +0200 (MEST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 08:54:21 +0200 (MEST)
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 22:01:46 +0200 (MEST)
  • Re: malloc()? vmalloc()? kmalloc()? Tue, 4 Aug 1998 10:16:27 +0200 (MEST)
• Russell Leighton
  • test, please ignore Wed, 05 Aug 1998 15:52:41 -0400
• Ruurd A Reitsma
  • PATCH ACI mixer Miro PCM12/20 as a module Wed, 05 Aug 1998 01:12:09 +0200
• Samuel Leo
  • Port forward + FTP + PASV mode Tue, 04 Aug 1998 18:04:05 +0800
• Samuli Kaski
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 12:20:13 +0300 (EEST)
• Samuli Valo
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 13:44:09 +0300 (EET DST)
• Scott McDermott
  • Re: 2.1.113 Mill I 8MB & scrollback :-( Thu, 6 Aug 1998 05:04:40 -0400
• Sergey Novikov
  • Help! Mon, 03 Aug 1998 13:47:27 PDT
• Seth M. Landsman
  • 2.1.114 fails to compile Mon, 3 Aug 1998 18:42:35 -0400
• shalon@interlock.dfw.ibm.com
  • Re: Layout/Setup of Kernel 03 Aug 1998 10:32:28 -0500
• Shawn K. Nocita
  • Compile fails 2.1.113 "trm290.c" Sun, 02 Aug 1998 11:52:41 -0400 (EDT)
• Shawn Leas
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 19:12:03 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 18:20:46 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 18:38:39 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Linux-2.1.115 - code freeze. Fri, 7 Aug 1998 18:39:31 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 18:33:08 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 02:21:26 -0500 (CDT)
  • Old Reiser benchmarks (was re: that huge DEVfs thread) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 02:17:34 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 22:29:35 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 18:33:55 -0500 (CDT)
  • What's a good SMP MB Manufacturer? Thu, 6 Aug 1998 21:26:07 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 18:05:43 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 15:56:16 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 21:21:42 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 21:13:02 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 21:02:28 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 20:46:50 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 20:28:16 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: v2.1.11x: loop device oddities Wed, 5 Aug 1998 20:24:54 -0500 (CDT)
  • RE: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 20:20:05 -0500 (CDT)
  • A plea to end the SPAM!!! Wed, 5 Aug 1998 19:53:42 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 20:12:07 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: single kernel tree ? was Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 20:04:46 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 19:23:22 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 16:55:50 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 17:04:13 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 16:51:36 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 16:50:38 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 16:43:37 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 16:59:24 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 17:55:44 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 17:37:29 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 17:12:42 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 23:46:03 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 00:04:06 -0500 (CDT)
  • DEVFS: TDT before complaining about it (READ THIS!) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 23:54:30 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 01:19:07 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 01:02:40 -0500 (CDT)
  • DEVFS: TDT before complaining about it (READ THIS!) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 23:54:30 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 23:46:03 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 20:35:25 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 16:40:36 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: devfs compatibility Tue, 4 Aug 1998 15:20:22 -0500 (CDT)
  • OOPS: 2.1.114 + devfs Tue, 4 Aug 1998 01:37:05 -0500 (CDT)
  • ONE PATCH TO COMPILE 2.1.114 (was Re: 2.1.114 fails build on i386) Mon, 3 Aug 1998 23:38:39 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Mon, 3 Aug 1998 20:49:58 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: 2.1.113 fails to compile Mon, 3 Aug 1998 15:49:05 -0500 (CDT)
  • DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Mon, 3 Aug 1998 04:08:45 -0500 (CDT)
  • SMBFS: Question... Mon, 3 Aug 1998 01:09:43 -0500 (CDT)
• Sid Boyce
  • Re: pseudo-tty problems w/2.1.115 Sat, 08 Aug 1998 13:15:31 +0000
  • RE: pty problems in 2.1.115 Fri, 07 Aug 1998 18:48:56 +0000
  • Re: 2.1.111-1 SMP: VesaFB on Matrox Mill-II works! Mon, 03 Aug 1998 07:25:59 +0000
  • RE: HOWTO-vesafb v0.5 Mon, 03 Aug 1998 06:33:09 +0000
• Simon Kenyon
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 05 Aug 1998 11:53:42 +0100
• Simon Richter
  • Re: Crash with 2.0.33 Mon, 03 Aug 1998 17:34:01 +0200
  • Crash with 2.0.33 Mon, 03 Aug 1998 02:41:57 +0200
• Slyglif Cain
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 18:41:44 -0700
  • multiple messages Tue, 4 Aug 1998 21:01:12 -0700
  • multiple messages Tue, 4 Aug 1998 21:01:12 -0700
  • multiple messages Tue, 4 Aug 1998 21:01:12 -0700
• Smilax Rotundifolia
  • Re: How to crash the linux console (framebuffer, that is) Mon, 3 Aug 1998 23:07:36 -0400 (EDT)
• Somnath Roy
  • Problem with ping with DE500 Ethernet adapter Fri, 7 Aug 1998 19:36:53 +0530 (IST)
• Spirilis
  • Addendum to the console problems Mon, 3 Aug 1998 23:23:21 -0400 (EDT)
• Stefan Meixner
  • Re: ftp trouble 2.1.114 <> Cray-System Wed, 5 Aug 1998 12:54:38 +0200 (CEST)
  • ftp trouble 2.1.114 <> Cray-System Tue, 4 Aug 1998 19:43:35 +0200 (CEST)
• Stefan Traby
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 15:08:05 +0200
  • Re: Irritating ext2fs corruption Tue, 4 Aug 1998 00:22:08 +0200
• Steffen Grunewald
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 09:54:30 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Hauppauge WinTV pci success report Wed, 5 Aug 1998 09:24:12 +0200 (MET DST)
  • radio freqs (was: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 12:58:19 +0200 (MET DST)
• Steffen Zahn
  • Re: pty problems in 2.1.115 Fri, 7 Aug 1998 21:54:46 +0200
• Stephen Frost
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 02:50:07 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 17:48:37 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 13:12:31 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 11:12:54 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 09:05:10 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 08:57:48 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 08:49:53 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: cooked and raw files (was: Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 08:14:25 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 07:51:50 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: non exec stack & devfs threads! Fri, 7 Aug 1998 07:45:40 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 13:14:43 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 13:09:34 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:20:20 -0400 (EDT)
• Stephen Smoogen
  • Re: !!Warning!! UDMA and Fujitsu HD Mon, 3 Aug 1998 10:47:32 -0400 (EDT)
• Steve Snyder
  • Is Documentation/ioctl-numbers.txt still accurate? Thu, 6 Aug 1998 12:33:11 -0400
  • [2.1.113] What is CHECK_TTY_COUNT warning me about? Wed, 5 Aug 1998 11:41:39 -0400
  • [2.1.113] No-console config still won't build Tue, 4 Aug 1998 08:39:49 -0400
  • [2.1.113] NIC stats are mis-displayed Mon, 3 Aug 1998 18:22:17 -0400
  • Re[2]: Me too: "PCI: Discovered primary peer bus xx" Mon, 3 Aug 1998 11:01:09 -0400
• Steve VanDevender
  • Re: floating-point abuse in 2.1.113 Thu, 6 Aug 1998 17:04:35 -0700 (PDT)
• Syd Alsobrook
  • Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Mon, 03 Aug 1998 23:45:09 -0400
• Taral
  • RE: rshaper-1.01, for linux-2.0 Sat, 8 Aug 1998 02:40:48 -0500
  • ACLs in ext2fs Fri, 7 Aug 1998 22:11:33 -0500
  • gcc 2.7.2.3 vs gcc 2.8.1 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 19:10:19 -0500
  • RE: TCP/IP Routing by user id? Tue, 4 Aug 1998 11:52:52 -0500
• Ted Deppner
  • Re: 2.1.115: ptys broken Fri, 7 Aug 1998 22:43:47 -0700
• Terry L Ridder
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Sat, 08 Aug 1998 02:07:37 -0500
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Sat, 08 Aug 1998 01:59:35 -0500
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 07 Aug 1998 04:00:42 -0500
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 07 Aug 1998 01:16:34 -0500
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 06 Aug 1998 23:38:46 -0500
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 06 Aug 1998 22:42:02 -0500
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 05 Aug 1998 15:03:02 -0500
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 05 Aug 1998 13:09:36 -0500
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 05 Aug 1998 04:11:04 -0500
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 05 Aug 1998 03:27:48 -0500
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 05 Aug 1998 02:26:21 -0500
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 05 Aug 1998 04:11:04 -0500
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 05 Aug 1998 00:37:30 -0500
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Tue, 04 Aug 1998 23:52:56 -0500
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Tue, 04 Aug 1998 22:51:35 -0500
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 05 Aug 1998 01:43:50 -0500
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 05 Aug 1998 01:48:17 -0500
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 05 Aug 1998 00:37:30 -0500
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Tue, 04 Aug 1998 23:52:56 -0500
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Tue, 04 Aug 1998 22:51:35 -0500
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 05 Aug 1998 03:27:48 -0500
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 05 Aug 1998 00:37:30 -0500
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Tue, 04 Aug 1998 22:51:35 -0500
  • CIAO graphs of Linux-2.0.34 (was Re: Static analysis of the Linux kernel) Tue, 04 Aug 1998 15:21:38 -0500
  • Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Mon, 03 Aug 1998 11:41:51 -0500
  • Re: Static analysis of the Linux kernel Mon, 03 Aug 1998 02:23:57 -0500
• Tethys
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 07 Aug 1998 13:35:51 +0100
• The Thought Assassin
  • Network Driver Maintainers. Fri, 7 Aug 1998 20:53:45 +0800 (WST)
• Theodore Y. Ts'o
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 20:15:08 -0400
  • Re: [2.1.113] What is CHECK_TTY_COUNT warning me about? Fri, 7 Aug 1998 20:21:55 -0400
  • Re: [2.1.113] What is CHECK_TTY_COUNT warning me about? Fri, 7 Aug 1998 12:23:13 -0400
  • Re: Sending 256 bytes synchronously from 16550A w/ Linux or RT-Linux Fri, 7 Aug 1998 11:09:04 -0400
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 11:46:43 -0400
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 18:58:21 -0400
  • Re: [2.1.113] What is CHECK_TTY_COUNT warning me about? Thu, 6 Aug 1998 21:59:12 -0400
  • Re: Is Documentation/ioctl-numbers.txt still accurate? Thu, 6 Aug 1998 21:42:45 -0400
  • Re: ext2 corruption?? Thu, 6 Aug 1998 13:38:28 -0400
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 13:55:14 -0400
  • Re: ext2 corruption. How to remove the result. Wed, 5 Aug 1998 17:03:36 -0400
  • Re: is this fs corruption? Wed, 5 Aug 1998 19:01:34 -0400
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 15:10:55 -0400
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 11:36:12 -0400
  • Re: Irritating ext2fs corruption Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:24:55 -0400
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:35:51 -0400
  • Re: Irritating ext2fs corruption Tue, 4 Aug 1998 16:21:07 -0400
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 15:51:50 -0400
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Tue, 4 Aug 1998 15:10:42 -0400
  • Re: Irritating ext2fs corruption Mon, 3 Aug 1998 18:53:52 -0400
  • Re: Irritating ext2fs corruption Mon, 3 Aug 1998 14:09:44 -0400
• Thomas Bogendoerfer
  • problem with vgacon on Alphas Sat, 8 Aug 1998 14:16:50 +0200
  • Re: 2.1.113: still an SMP related oops at boot time Sun, 2 Aug 1998 15:30:02 +0200
• Thomas Molina
  • compiling 2.1.113 Tue, 4 Aug 1998 06:16:27 -0500 (CDT)
• Thomas Sailer
  • Netscape Communicator on a NFS mounted directory Mon, 03 Aug 1998 12:48:33 +0200
• Thomas Zehetbauer
  • TCPv4 bad checksums: solved Fri, 7 Aug 1998 14:13:34 +0200 (CEST)
• Thorsten Kukuk
  • struct ucred change in 2.1.113 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 13:39:12 +0200 (MET DST)
• Tigran Aivazian
  • execve("libm.so") -> SIGSEGV instead of ELIBEXEC Mon, 3 Aug 1998 17:05:24 +0100 (BST)
  • execve("libm.so") -> SIGSEGV instead of ENOEXEC. Mon, 3 Aug 1998 16:56:00 +0100 (BST)
• tmuller@agora.rdrop.com
  • Kernels 2.1.11[0-5] not booting... Thu, 6 Aug 1998 20:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
  • IO-APIC lost Interrupt? Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
  • System will not boot 2.1.11[0-4] Mon, 3 Aug 1998 19:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
  • Linux 2.1.113 SMP locking hard Sat, 1 Aug 1998 14:22:11 -0700 (PDT)
• Todd M. Roy
  • missing brackets in include/linux/sched.h in 2.1.114 Mon, 03 Aug 1998 22:28:36 -0400
• toddroy@softhome.net
  • missing brackets in include/linux/sched.h in 2.1.114 Mon, 3 Aug 1998 22:24:20 -0400
• Tom & Tarry Eastep
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 20:31:23 -0700
• Tom Eastep
  • [PATCH][NTFS] Corrects "XX is not an index" Errors Fri, 07 Aug 1998 14:59:02 -0700
  • Re: A nfs client bug? Thu, 06 Aug 1998 15:03:06 -0700
• Tom Rini
  • devfs-HOWTO ? Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:11:15 -0400 (EDT)
  • 2.1.114 compile error Mon, 3 Aug 1998 18:55:37 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: mtrr Sun, 2 Aug 1998 21:13:07 -0400 (EDT)
  • mtrr Sun, 2 Aug 1998 00:18:18 -0400 (EDT)
• Tom Vier
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] duplicates? Thu, 6 Aug 1998 01:24:18 -0400 (EDT)
• Tomasz Przygoda
  • Re: [2.1.113] NIC stats are mis-displayed Tue, 04 Aug 1998 00:49:45 -0400
  • Re: Help! Mon, 03 Aug 1998 20:43:49 -0400
  • Big drives (>=64GB) Mon, 03 Aug 1998 20:39:42 -0400
• Tracy R Reed
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Fri, 7 Aug 1998 16:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Fri, 7 Aug 1998 12:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: error in pipe.c? Thu, 6 Aug 1998 10:51:14 -0700 (PDT)
  • error in pipe.c? Wed, 5 Aug 1998 23:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
• Trever Adams
  • Re: 6x86 recognition Fri, 07 Aug 1998 14:34:15 -0500
  • Re: Stack Smashing and no-exec Fri, 07 Aug 1998 14:02:04 -0500
  • Stack Smashing and no-exec Thu, 06 Aug 1998 22:15:08 -0500
• Trevor Johnson
  • Re: newbie in hacking linux kernel Wed, 5 Aug 1998 22:07:41 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Looking for 4-way Xeon patches Mon, 3 Aug 1998 03:17:26 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation Mon, 3 Aug 1998 03:00:19 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Does linux support 8-sector floppies? Sun, 2 Aug 1998 02:33:30 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Gratuitous CD-ROM spelling changes Sun, 2 Aug 1998 01:20:16 -0400 (EDT)
• Tristan Savatier
  • can select with infinite timeout return 0 Wed, 05 Aug 1998 19:41:46 -0700
• TtG
  • 2.0.x/2.1.x hangs Sun, 02 Aug 1998 13:34:37 +0400
• tz@execpc.com
  • AHA1542 before 2.2 - is the new EH code working? Fri, 7 Aug 1998 17:54:53 -0400
• Ulf Carlsson
  • Re: 2.1.113 Mill I 8MB & scrollback :-( Fri, 7 Aug 1998 17:09:03 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] vesafb panning: scrollback support and nice speedup Fri, 7 Aug 1998 13:31:39 +0200 (CEST)
  • page foult Thu, 6 Aug 1998 20:42:14 +0200 (CEST)
• Ulrich Drepper
  • Re: execve("libm.so") -> SIGSEGV instead of ENOEXEC. 03 Aug 1998 09:51:11 -0700
• Ulrich Windl
  • 2.0.35: PPSkit-0.3.7 available Tue, 4 Aug 1998 08:19:09 +0200
• Vadim E. Kogan
  • Adaptec docs Tue, 04 Aug 1998 12:41:56 -0700
• Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?P=E4tsi
  • ext2 corruption. How to remove the result. Wed, 05 Aug 1998 11:29:34 +0300
• Vojtech Pavlik
  • Re: Linux 2.1.115ac1 released Sat, 8 Aug 1998 21:01:12 +0200
  • 2.1.115: processes hanging in close() on /dev/dsp Sat, 8 Aug 1998 11:41:51 +0200
  • Re: IDE drive data transfer rates, kernel optimization? Thu, 6 Aug 1998 01:07:28 +0200
• Volker.Lendecke@sernet.de
  • Re: SMBFS: Question... 04 Aug 1998 07:53:53 +0200
• von Essen, Matthias
  • Re: 2.1.115 compile error on Sparc arch Fri, 7 Aug 1998 11:10:14 +0100
  • 2.1.115 compile error on Sparc arch Thu, 6 Aug 1998 17:42:07 +0100
• Wim Coekaerts
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 05 Aug 1998 22:16:36 -0700
• winmute
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Thu, 6 Aug 1998 02:57:50 +0200
• Wojtek Slusarczyk
  • Re: Read this if you have PTY problems in 2.1.115 Sat, 8 Aug 1998 15:59:40 +0200 (CEST)
• Xia Hao
  • aic7xxx mailing list Mon, 3 Aug 1998 00:37:35 +0800 (CST)
• Yuri Kuzmenko
  • plug-gw from fwtk-firewall Tue, 4 Aug 1998 10:42:59 +0200
• Yuri Pletnioff
  • loop driver in 2.1.11x ... Thu, 6 Aug 1998 16:38:41 +0300 (EET DST)
• Zachary Amsden
  • Re: core dumps when uid has been changed since exec Tue, 4 Aug 1998 13:39:35 -0400
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 08:23:43 -0400
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Mon, 3 Aug 1998 13:18:07 -0400
  • [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Mon, 3 Aug 1998 11:56:24 -0400
• Zlatko Calusic
  • Re: pre-2.1.115-2 fails compile pgtable_cache_water 06 Aug 1998 21:11:16 +0200
  • 2.1.114 VFS code 5x slower than 2.0.33?!? 06 Aug 1998 19:38:53 +0200
  • Re: page_alloc strange mask += mask 06 Aug 1998 15:20:58 +0200
  • Re: Documentation on dcache (dentry) interface?, umsdos 06 Aug 1998 12:44:24 +0200
  • Re: page_alloc strange mask += mask 06 Aug 1998 11:21:40 +0200
  • Re: FB and MTRR 04 Aug 1998 23:05:32 +0200
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Alan Cox
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 16:49:02 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 12:49:10 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Alexander Kjeldaas
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 12:10:28 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Allan Hsu
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 23:01:42 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Andrea Arcangeli
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Sat, 8 Aug 1998 11:31:28 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Andy Sloane
  • Re: Linux-2.1.115 - code freeze. Fri, 7 Aug 1998 02:13:32 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Bill Hawes
  • Re: Stack Smashing and no-exec Fri, 7 Aug 1998 23:28:14 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿David S. Miller
  • Re: gcc 2.7.2.3 vs gcc 2.8.1 Wed, 5 Aug 1998 07:44:09 -0400 (EWT)
  • Re: gcc 2.7.2.3 vs gcc 2.8.1 Wed, 5 Aug 1998 07:44:09 -0400 (EWT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 18:26:51 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Gary Anderson
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 23:29:05 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Greaves Tristan TM
  • Re: new networking code, ipv4/arp.c and net/core/neighbour.c Wed, 5 Aug 1998 14:50:31 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿H. Peter Anvin
  • IDE driver able to hot-swap? Sat, 1 Aug 1998 22:51:37 -0500 (EST)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿John Alvord
  • video4linux problem (was problem compiling 2.1.109/112) Tue, 04 Aug 1998 15:58:47 +0100
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Kalle Andersson
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 11:33:36 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿len weiss
  • Re: new networking code, ipv4/arp.c and net/core/neighbour.c Wed, 5 Aug 1998 20:22:20 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Linus Torvalds
  • RE: rshaper-1.01, for linux-2.0 Sat, 8 Aug 1998 14:38:39 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Mark Lord
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 12:46:00 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Marty Leisner
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 23:29:05 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 23:27:53 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Mikael Pettersson
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 09:24:18 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Nathan Hand
  • Re: Idea to make a kickass TCP read! Fri, 7 Aug 1998 02:16:02 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Nix
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 08:11:42 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿peloy@ven.ra.rockwell.com
  • Re: socket destroy delayed Tue, 4 Aug 1998 23:12:14 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Peter Waltenberg
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 23:29:05 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 10:19:43 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Richard Gooch
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 10:23:21 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 23:27:53 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Rik van Riel
  • Simple Kernel doc patch. Sun, 2 Aug 1998 12:34:16 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Rogier Wolff
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] duplicates? Wed, 5 Aug 1998 17:39:13 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Shawn Leas
  • Duplicate messages.. Wed, 5 Aug 1998 21:06:25 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 17:43:41 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Wed, 5 Aug 1998 17:38:14 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Steffen Zahn
  • Re: cooked and raw files (was: Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)) Fri, 7 Aug 1998 16:30:48 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Steve Snyder
  • (no subject) Mon, 03 Aug 1998 15:24:12 +0100
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Alan Cox
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 12:50:28 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Alexander Kjeldaas
  • Re: devfs Sat, 8 Aug 1998 12:38:27 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Bill Hawes
  • Re: PPP patch added in 2.1.109 broke my ppp Fri, 7 Aug 1998 22:30:27 -0500 (CDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿David S. Miller
  • 2.1.114: VFAT corrupts first block of a file Wed, 5 Aug 1998 05:02:04 +0200 (METDST)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Gary Anderson
  • Re: socket destroy delayed Tue, 4 Aug 1998 23:12:14 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Linus Torvalds
  • Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) Sat, 8 Aug 1998 14:40:35 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Marty Leisner
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Tue, 4 Aug 1998 23:27:53 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Richard Gooch
  • Re: gcc 2.7.2.3 vs gcc 2.8.1 Wed, 5 Aug 1998 07:44:09 -0400 (EWT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Rogier Wolff
  • Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds Wed, 5 Aug 1998 17:41:22 -0400 (EDT)
• ©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿©K
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Linus Torvalds
  • Re: rshaper-1.01, for linux-2.0 Sat, 8 Aug 1998 14:44:28 -0400 (EDT)