Linux-kernel mailing list archive 1998-49,: Re: ARRGHH !!! Gated is broken again in 2.1.131 ...

# Re: ARRGHH !!! Gated is broken again in 2.1.131 ...

kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Wed, 9 Dec 1998 20:11:29 +0300 (MSK)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Alan McLean: "Re: redhat 5.2 kernel"
- Previous message: Abhay Kanhere: "2.1.131:hdparm -w1 for UDMA on via"
- Next in thread: Mr. James W. Laferriere: "Re: ARRGHH !!! Gated is broken again in 2.1.131 ..."
- Reply: Mr. James W. Laferriere: "Re: ARRGHH !!! Gated is broken again in 2.1.131 ..."
- Reply: Serguei Koubouchine: "Re: ARRGHH !!! Gated is broken again in 2.1.131 ..."

Hello!

> The symptoms are exactly the same as it was before the bug (missing or extra
> '!', don't remember which one) has been squashed - gated starts, adds routes
> to local interface and that's all. It does neither hear neighbours' OSPF
> announces

It is possible if eepro100 is unhappy again.

> nor sends them itself.

And it is impossible. Does it try at least? strace?

> No complains, it does run, but routing is
> set only to local interfaces.

Turn on gated tracing.

I repeat (and you can check it yourself), nothing that could affect
gated was changed in 2.1.130-131. The reason may be anywhere: (f.e. in
gated.conf).

Alexey

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Alan McLean: "Re: redhat 5.2 kernel"
- Previous message: Abhay Kanhere: "2.1.131:hdparm -w1 for UDMA on via"
- Next in thread: Mr. James W. Laferriere: "Re: ARRGHH !!! Gated is broken again in 2.1.131 ..."
- Reply: Mr. James W. Laferriere: "Re: ARRGHH !!! Gated is broken again in 2.1.131 ..."
- Reply: Serguei Koubouchine: "Re: ARRGHH !!! Gated is broken again in 2.1.131 ..."