Re: [OT] Re: Linux name in BAD taste

[James Michael Keller]

Matthew Vanecek wrote:
> 
> [e-mail] wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 19 May 1999, Thomas E. Dodd /CSDC wrote:
> >
> > > The site www.linuxhq.org has a home page with extremely vulgar
> > > language. This is definatly not the image that should be associated
> > > with linux.
> >
> > I just looked. WHAT *vulgar* langauge?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Alex.
> >
> 
> That's what I was wondering.  All I saw was regret that linuxhq.com had
> disappeared, and an inquiry about the location of the pages' sources
> that were there.  I sent him a pointer to kernelnotes.org, which seems
> to be linuxhq.com's replacement.
> 

	Speaking of that - what the heck happend with that?  How did it get yanked
after two years?  Everything I've heard has been very vuage at best.
-- 
---------------------+---------------------------------------
James Michael Keller | 	[e-mail]
      "Tech"         |  http://www.radix.net/~jmkeller
---------------------+---------------------------------------
"Linux is not a destination, 
		       it is simply an open road to tomorrow"
-------------------------------------------------------------			
	     Contents (c)1999 James Michael Keller
-------------------------------------------------------------