Linux-kernel mailing list archive 1999-25,: Re: kernel compile in RH60

# Re: kernel compile in RH60

Mr. James W. Laferriere (babydr@baby-dragons.com)
Sat, 19 Jun 1999 18:10:47 -0700 (PDT)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: John Gardiner Myers: "Re: Why khttpd is a bad idea (was a pointless argument aboutdevfs) Any"
- Previous message: Dan Hollis: "Re: kHTTPd: Good or Bad"

Hello Tom, Is there some patch to stock gcc-2.7.2.3 ? the
stock one I have complains when trying to do a ./configure
ie:

[root@as200 gcc-2.7.2.3]# ./configure
This appears to be a alpha-unknown-linux system.
Configuration alpha-unknown-linux not supported

Tia, JimL

On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Tom Eastep wrote:
> Kastus Shchuka wrote:
> > Is it the right thing to do to use stock Red Hat
> > 6.0 egcs to compile kernel or is it better to fall back to gcc 2.7.2.3
> > (from Red Hat 5.2) for this purpose? I'm talking about Intel platform.
> Well, after massive metadata corruption on my /usr partition, I've
> installed gcc 2.7.2.3. Time will tell if egcs from RH60 was the cause of
> the corruption...
>
> -Tom
> PS - I'd recommend building and installing gcc 2.7.2.3 from source. That
> works fine and you can still use egcs if you want to.
> --
> Tom Eastep
> Compaq Computer Corporation
> Enterprise Computing Group
> Tandem Division
> tom.eastep@compaq.com
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| James W. Laferriere | System Techniques | Give me VMS |
| Network Engineer | 25416 22nd So | Give me Linux |
| babydr@baby-dragons.com | DesMoines WA 98198 | only on AXP |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: John Gardiner Myers: "Re: Why khttpd is a bad idea (was a pointless argument aboutdevfs) Any"
- Previous message: Dan Hollis: "Re: kHTTPd: Good or Bad"