Linux-kernel mailing list archive 1999-25,: Re: version.h in 2.2.10

# Re: version.h in 2.2.10

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:25:26 +0100 (BST)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: UUIDs (and devfs and major/minor numbers)"
- Previous message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: why no fdset patch in kernel?"

> I was compiling samba 2.0.4, and it complained that there was no
> version.h. The baffled me, since it's always been there. Upon

Samba shouldn't in theory be including kernel headers. If it does then
it should know how to generate version.h itself

> the patch, have the correct version (2.2.10) in version.h. Maybe the
> tarballs aren't as complete as the patched versions? This is somewhat
> disturbing.

It is generated when the kernel builds.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: UUIDs (and devfs and major/minor numbers)"
- Previous message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: why no fdset patch in kernel?"