Linux-kernel mailing list archive 1999-25,: Re: Some very thought-provoking ideas about OS architecture.

# Re: Some very thought-provoking ideas about OS architecture.

Remi Turk (coder@a2zis.com)
Mon, 21 Jun 1999 15:33:17 +0100

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Chris Adams: "Re: Some very thought-provoking ideas about OS architecture."
- Previous message: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "[PATCH] tiny fix for ide-proc.c"
- Maybe in reply to: Eric S. Raymond: "Some very thought-provoking ideas about OS architecture."
- Next in thread: Steve Underwood: "Re: Some very thought-provoking ideas about OS architecture."

Hello,
I missed a few mails, so don't shoot me if this has already been said
(or is completely stupid), but I can imagine the following situation:
- An error happens (i.e. a mm bug in EROS)
- EROS doesn't discover it and writes VM to harddisk.
- A few minutes later the system crashes do to the mem-corruption.
- After booting, the mem-corruption has already happened, so it will
crash again.

    --
    Advantages of Windows NT over Linux:
     * It's easier to explain the crash was not your fault.
     * You've to remember only one solution all to your problems: Reboot.
     * You can use your mouse to type an email-message.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Chris Adams: "Re: Some very thought-provoking ideas about OS architecture."
- Previous message: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "[PATCH] tiny fix for ide-proc.c"
- Maybe in reply to: Eric S. Raymond: "Some very thought-provoking ideas about OS architecture."
- Next in thread: Steve Underwood: "Re: Some very thought-provoking ideas about OS architecture."