Linux-kernel mailing list archive 1999-34,: Re: New resources - pls, explain :-(

# Re: New resources - pls, explain :-(

Jes Sorensen (Jes.Sorensen@cern.ch)
22 Aug 1999 22:43:59 +0200

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Kernels > 1M"
- Previous message: Richard Guy Briggs: "Re: linux-ipsec: possibly bogus value passed to skb->dst->output"
- In reply to: Philip Blundell: "Re: New resources - pls, explain :-("
- Next in thread: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Cache incoherencies (WAS: New resources - pls, explain :-( )"

>>>>> "Philip" == Philip Blundell <Philip.Blundell@pobox.com> writes:

Philip> This is what the dma_cache_xxx functions defined in asm/io.h
Philip> are for.
>> Just notice that there is currently no cross-architecture
>> definition of these macros - all architectures name the differently
>> and the ones that are coherent don't have them at all.

Philip> Oh, I thought all the ports had these macros these days (even
Philip> though most of them are defined to do nothing). Oops.

Nope, something we need to deal with at some point.

Jes

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Kernels > 1M"
- Previous message: Richard Guy Briggs: "Re: linux-ipsec: possibly bogus value passed to skb->dst->output"
- In reply to: Philip Blundell: "Re: New resources - pls, explain :-("
- Next in thread: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Cache incoherencies (WAS: New resources - pls, explain :-( )"