Linux-kernel mailing list archive 1999-34,: Re: Kernels > 1M

# Re: Kernels > 1M

Zack Weinberg (zack@bitmover.com)
Sun, 22 Aug 1999 15:55:15 -0700

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Mirian Crzig Lennox: "Re: Kernels > 1M"
- Previous message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: Kernels > 1M"
- Next in thread: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: Kernels > 1M"
- Reply: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: Kernels > 1M"

Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> >In short, you're proposing a massive project, and hasn't come up with
> >any justification other than the fact that "the other guys do it", which
> >is no justification at all.
>
> without mention that the guys that are using a plain ELF kernel image
> can't do a `cp /vmlinuz /dev/fd0` and boot from floopy without using a
> boot loader as we can instead do 8). Being able to boot a machine with
> only a kernel-image is more robust IMO.

Misconception. You can't cp /usr/src/linux/vmlinux to /dev/fd0 and
have it work on any architecture. You -can- cp
.../arch/i386/boot/zImage to /dev/fd0 and have it work, but I never
proposed we break that. (And what I want would let you do e.g.
cat arch/i386/boot/bootsect vmlinux.gz >/dev/fd0.)

zw

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Mirian Crzig Lennox: "Re: Kernels > 1M"
- Previous message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: Kernels > 1M"
- Next in thread: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: Kernels > 1M"
- Reply: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: Kernels > 1M"