Sorry if this has been already suggested.
Gérard.
On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Benno Senoner wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > I'm afraid, if we want that Linux will be a good multimedia OS, this is a
> > > _STRONGLY_NEEDED_ feature.
> > >
> > > The user wants to playback his video/audio from disk, and still be able
> > > to launch his apps, without waiting 10 secs for loading a simple xterm.
> > >
> > > The SCT's raw-io patches are nice, but not very suitable in a general purpose
> > > multimedia enviroment, since you can't tell to the user to store his videos on a
> > > raw partition.
> >
> > Stephens patches are basis of raw I/O on files in a filesystem too.
>
> That sounds nice to me !
> Any idea when some patches ( for raw file I/O in a filesystem) will be available
> ?
> >
> > However what you are saying and raw-io don't neccessarily tally. You are
> > actually saying "there is a bug in the current page cache handling for
> > this kind of operation". Far better therefore to fix the heuristic used.
>
> No , I'm not saying that there is a bug, I'm saying that the
> filebuffering works very well in almost all cases , except of reading large
> files from disk continuously.
> This is of course quite logical since the kernel makes assumptions that you
> will read this large file again, and therefore the kernel has to put it into
> the buffer cache.
>
> In this case I don't need raw I/O to get fast response or higher throughput,
> but only to avoid that the streaming apps do not monopolizes the buffer, which
> is very bad.
>
> will the SCT's patches add an O_DIRECT -like flag ala SGI ?
>
> regards,
> Benno.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/