Linux-kernel mailing list archive 1999-34,: Re: 2.2.10: Original Intel 486 not recognized

# Re: 2.2.10: Original Intel 486 not recognized

Ulrich Windl (ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de)
Thu, 26 Aug 1999 15:47:06 +0200

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: R. Kelley Cook: "Re: Linux on AMD Athlon 800 MHz"
- Previous message: Matthias Wenzel: "Re: NFS in 2.2.11 (possibly 2.2.x) sucks BIGTIME."
- Maybe in reply to: Ulrich Windl: "2.2.10: Original Intel 486 not recognized"
- Next in thread: Andrew Gormanly: "Re: 2.2.10: Original Intel 486 not recognized"

On 26 Aug 99, at 14:43, Andrew Gormanly wrote:

> Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > I.e. it seems the "cpu" tag is gone without a proper replacement.
>
> Not so. The "cpu family" tag replaces it. FWIW, my DX2-66 is not
> recognized as Intel either...

The basic question remaining is: Why are all these strings in
arch/i386/kernel/setup.c if they don't appear anywhere?

Or did some recent "advanced" CPU detection break the more basic CPU
models?

Regards,
Ulrich

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: R. Kelley Cook: "Re: Linux on AMD Athlon 800 MHz"
- Previous message: Matthias Wenzel: "Re: NFS in 2.2.11 (possibly 2.2.x) sucks BIGTIME."
- Maybe in reply to: Ulrich Windl: "2.2.10: Original Intel 486 not recognized"
- Next in thread: Andrew Gormanly: "Re: 2.2.10: Original Intel 486 not recognized"