Linux-kernel mailing list archive 1999-34,: Oracle and Linux (hand in hand)

# Oracle and Linux (hand in hand)

Matthew (matthew@mattshouse.com)
Sat, 28 Aug 1999 00:19:30 -0500

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Gaddoni Marco: "RE: AMD optimizations?"
- Previous message: Seth Van Oort: "modules of same name"
- Next in thread: Matthew Kirkwood: "Re: Oracle and Linux (hand in hand)"
- Reply: Matthew Kirkwood: "Re: Oracle and Linux (hand in hand)"
- Reply: Steve Willer: "Re: Oracle and Linux (hand in hand)"
- Reply: justinf@us.ibm.com: "Re: Oracle and Linux (hand in hand)"

I've read tuning tips wrt Oracle on Linux. Most say to increase SHMMAX and the
semaphores. I ask you this, what _real_ difference does it make? Am I going
to be able to see the difference on a VA3500 (quad pent III 550,512M RAM)? I'd
much rather use a stock kernel, but I'll hack for the good of my users.

    --

    To segfault is human, to blue screen is moronic...
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Matthew
    matthew@mattshouse.com
    http://www.mattshouse.com

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Gaddoni Marco: "RE: AMD optimizations?"
- Previous message: Seth Van Oort: "modules of same name"
- Next in thread: Matthew Kirkwood: "Re: Oracle and Linux (hand in hand)"
- Reply: Matthew Kirkwood: "Re: Oracle and Linux (hand in hand)"
- Reply: Steve Willer: "Re: Oracle and Linux (hand in hand)"
- Reply: justinf@us.ibm.com: "Re: Oracle and Linux (hand in hand)"