Linux-kernel mailing list archive 1999-37,: Re: POSIX aio vs completion ports

# Re: POSIX aio vs completion ports

Jamie Lokier (lkd@tantalophile.demon.co.uk)
Sun, 12 Sep 1999 21:31:18 +0200

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Walter Hofmann: "Re: 2.2.13-pre6"
- Previous message: Urban Widmark: "Re: smbfs unresolved symbol get_cached_page"

Chuck Lever wrote:
> there's no good way for the application (or library) to allocate a
> specific RT signal, so there must be some form of "gentlemen's
> agreement" between libraries and application as to which uses which
> signal.

My strategy: search for the first rt signal that's not got SIG_DFL as
its handler.

Imperfect I know but probably better than random() :)

-- Jamie

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Walter Hofmann: "Re: 2.2.13-pre6"
- Previous message: Urban Widmark: "Re: smbfs unresolved symbol get_cached_page"