Linux-kernel mailing list archive 1999-37,: Re: Interrupts for userspace

# Re: Interrupts for userspace

Artur Skawina (skawina@geocities.com)
Tue, 14 Sep 1999 18:26:47 +0200

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Lech Szychowski: "Re: Lock-up on boot, Kernel 2.3.18-ac2"
- Previous message: Ben Collins: "Re: Accountability"
- Maybe in reply to: Pavel Machek: "Interrupts for userspace"
- Next in thread: Jesse Pollard: "Re: Interrupts for userspace"

Jamie Lokier wrote:
>
> In fact it's fine so long as no other driver is registered for the
> interrupt, as that means no other device should be asserting the line.
>
> So it's fine for development prior to moving the code into kernel space.
>
> Now, has someone written something better than Pavel's i2sig.c for this
> or should I get on with it?

i can think of pcidev by Justin Schoeman <justin@suntiger.ee.up.ac.za>
and usirq by Eric Lammerts <eric@scintilla.utwente.nl>; not sure any
of these are "better" though (they all do +/- the same thing, iirc)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Lech Szychowski: "Re: Lock-up on boot, Kernel 2.3.18-ac2"
- Previous message: Ben Collins: "Re: Accountability"
- Maybe in reply to: Pavel Machek: "Interrupts for userspace"
- Next in thread: Jesse Pollard: "Re: Interrupts for userspace"