+ some or all of ingo's latency patches
+ appropriate dynamic sizing of kernel hash tables
On 04-Jan-2000 Chuck Lever wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
>> The order is approximate priority. It may also not be totally accurate.
>> Suggestions/fixes welcome.
>
> may i suggest:
>
> + some or all of ingo's latency patches
> + 32 bit uid/gid support
> + madvise
> + ibm's task struct cacheline fix for goodness()
> + appropriate dynamic sizing of kernel hash tables
-- Brian Hall <brianw.hall@compaq.com> http://www.bigfoot.com/~brihall Linux Consultant- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/