> > The order is approximate priority. It may also not be totally accurate.
> > Suggestions/fixes welcome.
>
> may i suggest:
> + some or all of ingo's latency patches
> + 32 bit uid/gid support
> + madvise
> + ibm's task struct cacheline fix for goodness()
> + appropriate dynamic sizing of kernel hash tables
Chuck - your fdalloc patch was fairly self-contained wasn't it? That's
a nice, cheap speedup in some useful cases, isn't it?
Matthew.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/