> If votes count, I'll second:
> + some or all of ingo's latency patches
> + appropriate dynamic sizing of kernel hash tables
If they do, and we are at Ingo's stuffs, I would give high priority to
getting the RAID 0.90 stuff working for 2.3.x. I think it will need a
while to get all of the bugs squezed out of it with the late blockIO
queue, IDE changes, and there are quite a lot people who want to use the
linux power to build reasonably cheap and fast servers with
UDMA/66+RAID0/5...
-- SaPE
Peter Sasi <sape@sch.hu>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/